Forrester studies project more than 100% ROI for enterprises and 16-month payback for midmarket organizations using Dynamics 365 ERP

Forrester studies project more than 100% ROI for enterprises and 16-month payback for midmarket organizations using Dynamics 365 ERP

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) decisions are among the most consequential investments a business can make; shaping how organizations operate, scale, and compete for years to come. Yet many ERP transformations have historically carried risk: high costs, long timelines, heavy customization, and uncertain returns.

To bring clarity to these decisions, Microsoft commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct two independent Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) studies examining the business value of Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP on enterprises and midmarket organizations.

From fragmentation to integration: Why ERP modernization matters

Across both 2026 studies, Forrester’s projections showed organizations from a similar place: fragmented ERP landscapes, siloed data, manual processes, and highly customized legacy systems that were difficult to upgrade or scale. These environments could limit real-time visibility, slow decision-making, and increased operational risk; particularly as organizations grew, expanded into new markets, or managed increasingly complex supply chains. These constraints didn’t just slow operations; they could limit a leader’s ability to respond to volatility, growth, and supply chain disruption with confidence.

In response, organizations turned to Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP to consolidate finance and supply chain operations with a unified, cloud-based platform. By centralizing data and standardizing processes, organizations can improve operational efficiency and gain timely, actionable insights across the business.

Importantly, this shift reframed ERP from a back-office system of record to a platform for informed, faster decision-making that connects data, people, and processes across the enterprise.

Quantifying business value with Forrester’s TEI methodology

The strength of the TEI studies lies in their focus on quantifiable business impact. Forrester evaluated benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks over a multi‑year period, modeling a composite organization based on real customer interviews and survey responses. This approach allows leaders to evaluate ERP investments using a transparent financial framework rather than vendor claims alone.

Enterprise ERP: Financial impact at scale

In the enterprise TEI study, Forrester modeled a composite organization representing large, complex businesses using Dynamics 365 ERP. The analysis projects that over three years, the organization achieved:

  • 101% return on investment (ROI)
  • Net present value (NPV) of $12.9 million

These results were driven by a combination of operational efficiency gains, productivity improvements, and cost reductions, particularly from consolidating legacy systems and reducing infrastructure and IT operations spend.

The study highlights that value did not come from isolated features, but from standardizing processes, unifying data across finance and supply chain functions, and reducing reliance on heavily customized, on-premises ERP environments.

Key enterprise findings business leaders should note

For business decision makers evaluating ERP at scale, several findings stand out:

  • Improved operational efficiency and productivity can be enabled through streamlined workflows and better access to real-time insights
  • Reduced infrastructure and IT operations costs can be enabled by retiring multiple legacy systems and shifting to a cloud-based ERP model
  • Faster, more confident decision making enabled by unified financial and supply-chain data

Together, these benefits contributed directly to the projected positive NPV and ROI modeled in the study, reinforcing ERP modernization as a business investment, not just an IT upgrade.

Midmarket ERP: Enterprise-grade value without enterprise complexity

While enterprises face complexity at scale, midmarket organizations often face a different challenge: how to grow without adding disproportionate cost or operational overhead. Forrester’s Total Economic Impact™ study of Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP for midmarket organizations examined how modern ERP can support expansion, improve visibility, and standardize operations without the burden of traditional enterprise‑scale implementations.

In the study, Forrester modeled a composite midmarket organization based on customer interviews and survey data. The analysis projects that the organization would achieve:

  • Payback in 16 months
  • Net present value (NPV) of $3.3 million over three years

These outcomes were driven by streamlined finance and supply chain operations, automation of manual processes, and the replacement of disconnected legacy systems with a single, cloud‑based ERP platform. By consolidating systems and standardizing processes, organizations can reduce operational friction while supporting improved visibility and control across the business.

Key midmarket findings business leaders should note

For midmarket decision-makers, the study highlights several critical outcomes:

  • Enabled faster time-to-value, with measurable financial returns realized in just over a year
  • Enabled improvements to operational efficiency and productivity through streamlined finance and supply chain processes and automation of manual tasks
  • Potentially reduced complexity and IT overhead by replacing disconnected legacy systems with a unified cloud ERP platform

These benefits contributed directly to the projected positive NPV and rapid payback modeled in the study, reinforcing ERP modernization as a financially disciplined investment for midmarket organizations focused on growth and resilience.

Why independent research matters for ERP decisions

ERP investments shape the future of an organization for years—sometimes decades. That’s why independent, third-party validation is critical. The Forrester TEI studies do not ask leaders to accept conclusions at face value; instead, they provide:

  • A transparent financial model
  • Explicit assumptions and risk adjustments
  • Clear linkage between operational improvements and economic outcomes

For executives, CFOs, COOs, and IT leaders, these studies offer a common language for aligning stakeholders and setting realistic expectations for ERP transformation.

Go deeper: Explore the full Forrester TEI studies

This summary only scratches the surface. The full Forrester Total Economic Impact™ studies include detailed benefit breakdowns, cost considerations, and financial modeling that business leaders can adapt to their own organizations.

For organizations considering ERP modernization, these studies provide a data-driven foundation to evaluate options, build a credible business case, and make informed decisions with confidence.

The post Forrester studies project more than 100% ROI for enterprises and 16-month payback for midmarket organizations using Dynamics 365 ERP appeared first on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog.

Brought to you by Dr. Ware, Microsoft Office 365 Silver Partner, Charleston SC.

Forrester studies project more than 100% ROI for enterprises and 16-month payback for midmarket organizations using Dynamics 365 ERP

Announcing Desktop Companion App (DCA) support for Dynamics 365 Contact Center Embedded in Third-Party CRMs  

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

We’re excited to introduce Desktop Companion App (DCA) support for Dynamics 365 Contact Center in Embedded mode, delivering lower latency, improved reliability, and resilient voice continuity when Customer Service Reps (CSR) work inside third party (3P) CRM environments. With DCA running alongside the embedded conversation widget, contact centers can maintain active calls even if the browser refreshes or becomes unresponsive without forcing CSRs to leave their CRM workspace. 

Why it matters 

Embedded deployments let organizations use Dynamics 365 Contact Center inside a nonMicrosoft CRM through a lightweight widget, so Customer Service Representatives (CSR) don’t have to switch tools. Pairing that embedded experience with DCA provides a dedicated voice path that’s independent of the browser, helping eliminate dropped or interrupted calls caused by page reloads, page freezes, or tab navigation. The result is faster call setup, steadier audio, and consistent CSR workflows across CRMs. 

Real world outcomes from earlier DCA adopters include reduced average speed to answer and fewer connectivity issues, underscoring the operational value of a desktop resident voice companion. 

What’s new for Embedded mode 

DCA + Embedded widget: a resilient voice experience inside your CRM UI 

  • Call continuity during browser events 
    • Active calls remain connected when the CRM page refreshes or becomes unresponsive; CSRs can continue the conversation and regain full web context when the tab recovers. 
  • Lower latency, better audio consistency 
    • DCA’s desktop process helps reduce connection delays and smooths device handling, complementing the embedded browser experience 
  • Familiar, lightweight controls 
    • CSRs can mute/unmute and end calls from DCA while the embedded widget reloads; when recording or transcription is enabled in the web app, they continue uninterrupted. 
  • Built for crossCRM 
    • Works alongside the embedded experience in third party CRMs that host the HTML/JavaScript widget. 

The internal brief for Embedded mode reiterates these benefits specifically for external CRM workspaces, including continuity across inbound/outbound workflows. 

How it works 

  1. Route and render: Dynamics 365 Contact Center routes the voice interaction; the embedded widget renders in the CRM for CSR workflows 
  1. Establish desktop voice path: DCA runs as a companion process on the desktop and maintains the call even if the 3P CRM browser reloads, freezes, or loses focus 
  1. Resynchronize: When the page returns, the call state resynchronizes with the embedded widget so the CSR continues in one unified flow. 

Business value 

  • Higher reliability: Fewer dropped calls and better resiliency against browser variability and tab navigation. 
  • Lower latency: Faster connection setup and more responsive audio device handling 
  • CSR productivity: CSRs stay in their CRM UI; DCA protects the call while the page recovers minimizing context loss and reducing redial effort 
  • Operational consistency: A common voice experience across standalone and embedded deployments, aligned to voice best practices. 

Getting started 

  1. Enable Embedded experience 
    • Follow the guide to configure and surface the conversation widget inside your 3P CRM. Retrieve the widget URL from the Copilot Service admin center and complete the setup steps in your CRM. 
  1. Install and manage DCA 
    • Deploy the Desktop Companion App to CSR devices, install the browser extension(s), and (optionally) control updates via policy/registry settings. 
  1. CSR usage 
    • CSRs sign in, handle calls as usual in the embedded widget, and use DCA as needed (e.g., during a refresh). Recording and transcription continue if configured in the web app 
  1. Validate with best practices 
    • Review voice channel best practices for network, device, and telemetry guidance to ensure optimal call performance across your environment 

Learn More

Install and manage Desktop companion application for voice channel | Microsoft Learn 

The post Announcing Desktop Companion App (DCA) support for Dynamics 365 Contact Center Embedded in Third-Party CRMs   appeared first on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog.

Brought to you by Dr. Ware, Microsoft Office 365 Silver Partner, Charleston SC.

Reimagining Secure Customer Interactions with Secure Consult & Transfer 

Reimagining Secure Customer Interactions with Secure Consult & Transfer 

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Empowering contact centers to safely handle sensitive, high‑trust customer journeys 

Delivering secure, compliant, and seamless customer experiences is no longer optional — it’s foundational. Across industries such as financial services, healthcare, and public sector, organizations must enable customers to complete high‑trust actions (like payments or identity verification) without exposing sensitive information to agents or core contact center systems. Secure contact center customer journeys enabled through capabilities like Secure Consult & Transfer bring this capability to life by allowing agents to involve external secure endpoints in the conversation while maintaining strict privacy boundaries. 

Today, we’re excited to highlight how Secure Consult & Transfer modernizes sensitive interactions and prepares organizations for the next generation of compliant service workflows. 

How It Works 

Secure numbers are created by applying specific settings to a contact. During runtime, the platform enforces the necessary protections instantly — without requiring manual intervention. The settings are flexible, and can be applied to only consult or transfer, or both. For consult and transfer the administrator can decide to follow workstream recording & transcription settings, stop recording but continue transcription, or stop both transcription & recording. Additionally, during consult, administrators can choose to either put their representatives on hold, or follow workstream settings to have the customer placed on hold with the representative able to take them off. 

Key Benefits at a Glance 

  • Protect sensitive customer data without disrupting workflows. 
  • Enable secure payment and verification scenarios using external trusted endpoints. 
  • Automate compliance controls — recording and transcription management happens instantly and safely. 

Secure Consult & Transfer ushers in a new era of secure, compliant customer interactions — one where sensitive workflows can happen inside the call experience without adding risk, friction, or operational burden. 

If your organization handles sensitive customer actions, now is the time to explore how this capability can strengthen trust, reduce risk, and streamline your service operations. 

Accelerating Secure Contact Center Customer Journeys with DTMF Broadcast 

A modern foundation for high‑trust, compliant, real‑time voice interactions 

As organizations modernize customer engagement, the need for secure and friction‑free voice workflows has become essential—especially for processes that rely on keypad inputs, such as payment authentication, IVR navigation, or identity verification. Traditional DTMF forwarding approaches rely on slow relays, creating latency, reliability gaps, and compliance concerns. 

DTMF Broadcast introduces a new, faster way for participants in a call to share DTMF tones in real time— addressing these gaps by sending DTMF tones from one participant instantly to all non‑hold participants, far faster than traditional forwarding. 

This includes all legs of the call, meaning that representatives can more reliably send tones to external endpoints, and if representatives drop off after a transfer to an external endpoint, customers will still be able to send DTMF to that endpoint, navigating IVRs independently. 

How to Enable DTMF Broadcast 

The toggle to enable DTMF Broadcast for an organization is in the Copilot Service Admin Center under Support Experience->Workspaces->Voice Experiences. 

The post Reimagining Secure Customer Interactions with Secure Consult & Transfer  appeared first on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog.

Brought to you by Dr. Ware, Microsoft Office 365 Silver Partner, Charleston SC.

Forrester studies project more than 100% ROI for enterprises and 16-month payback for midmarket organizations using Dynamics 365 ERP

Announcing End of Support for Dynamics 365 Project Service Automation (PSA) on the U.S. Government cloud

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

On March 19, 2024, we announced that support for Dynamics 365 Project Service Automation on the commercial cloud will end on March 31, 2025. As planned, end of support went into effect on that date. 

Today we are announcing the end of support for  Dynamics 365 Project Service Automation on the U.S. Government cloud (GCC) beginning March 31, 2027. Dynamics 365 Project Operations has been available in U.S. Government cloud (GCC) since December 2025 

Beginning March 31, 2027, Microsoft will no longer support PSA on GCC environments. There will not be any feature enhancements, updates, bug fixes, or other updates to this offering. Any support ticket logged for the PSA application on GCC will be closed with instructions to upgrade to Project Operations.    

We strongly encourage all PSA customers on GCC environments to start planning your upgrade process as soon as possible so you can take advantage of many new Project Operations features such as:   

  • Integration with Planner capabilities on Dataverse with many new advanced scheduling features  
  • Project Budgeting and Time-phased forecasting    
  • Date Effective price overrides   
  • Revision and Activation on Quotes     
  • Material usage recording in projects and tasks   
  • Subcontract Management   
  • Advances and Retained-based contracts   
  • Contract not-to-exceed   
  • Task and Progress based billing   
  • Multi-Customer contracts   
  • AI and Copilot based experiences.   

 For Project Service Automation customers on GCC High or DoD, we will have a future announcement regarding the availability of Dynamics 365 Project Operations. 

    Learn more about Dynamics 365 Project Operations  

    Project Operations was first released in October 2020 as a comprehensive product to manage Projects from inception to close by bringing together the strengths of Dataverse, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management, and Microsoft Planner. 

    Want to learn more about Project Operations? Check this link and navigate to our detailed documentation!   

    Want to try Project Operations? Click here and sign up for a 30-day trial!    

    The post Announcing End of Support for Dynamics 365 Project Service Automation (PSA) on the U.S. Government cloud appeared first on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog.

    Brought to you by Dr. Ware, Microsoft Office 365 Silver Partner, Charleston SC.

    Forrester studies project more than 100% ROI for enterprises and 16-month payback for midmarket organizations using Dynamics 365 ERP

    General Availability of Quality Evaluation Agent’s conversation capabilities 

    This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

    Quality Evaluation Agent in Dynamics 365 Customer Service and Dynamics 365 Contact Center is an AI-led evaluation framework that empowers teams to deliver consistent, scalable quality oversight and automate quality evaluations across customer interactions. 

    Beginning February 6, QEA conversation capabilities become generally available, joining case evaluation as a GA feature, as previously announced in this blog. This milestone expands QEA’s coverage and impact across customer support scenarios. 

    Looking Forward: 

    QEA continues to evolve with key upcoming enhancements across the evaluation framework. This includes multilanguage support, criteria versioning, the ability to flag critical questions, simulation capabilities, knowledge source adherence, and more. 

    Get started today by enabling QEA in your Dynamics 365 Customer Service and Dynamics 365 Contact Center environment.   

    Learn more  

    Watch a quick  video introduction.  

    For configuration steps, feature updates, and best practices, see  Manage Quality Evaluation Agent | Microsoft Learn  

    The post General Availability of Quality Evaluation Agent’s conversation capabilities  appeared first on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog.

    Brought to you by Dr. Ware, Microsoft Office 365 Silver Partner, Charleston SC.

    Evaluating AI Agents in Contact Centers: Introducing the Multi-modal Agents Score 

    Evaluating AI Agents in Contact Centers: Introducing the Multi-modal Agents Score 

    This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

    As self-service becomes the first stop in contact centers, AI agents now define the frontline customer experience. Modern customer interactions span voice, text, and visual channels, where meaning is shaped not only by what is said, but by how it’s said, when it’s said, and the context surrounding it.   

    In customer service, this is even more pronounced-customers reaching out for support don’t just convey information. They convey intent, sentiment, urgency, and emotion, often simultaneously across modalities; a pause or interruption on a voice call signals frustration,  blurred document image leads to downstream reasoning failures, and flat or fragmented response erodes trust-even if the answer is correct In our previous blog post, we reflected on the evolution of contact centers from scripted interactions to AI-driven experiences. As contact center landscape continues to change, the way we evaluate AI agents must change with them. Traditional approaches fall short by focusing on isolated metrics or single modalities, rather than the end-to-end customer experience. 

    Contact centers struggle to reliably assess whether their AI agents are improving over time or across architectures, channels, and deployments. While cloud services rely on absolute measures like availability, reliability and latency, AI agent evaluation today remains fragmented, relative, and modality specific. What would be useful is an absolute, normalized measure of end-to-end conversational quality- one that reflects how customers actually experience interactions and answers the fundamental question: Is this agent good at handling real customer conversations? 

    Introducing the Multimodal Agent Score (MAS) 

    MAS is built on the observation that every service interaction- whether human-to-human or human-to-agent- naturally progresses through three fundamental stages: (explored in more detail here: Measuring What Matters: Redefining Excellence for AI Agents in the Contact Center )

    1. Understanding the input – accurately capturing and interpreting what the customer is saying, including intent, context, and signals such as urgency or emotion. 
    1. Reasoning over that input – determining the appropriate actions, managing context across turns, and deciding how to resolve the issue responsibly. 
    1. Responding effectively – delivering clear, natural, and confident resolution in the right tone and format. 

    Multimodal Agent Score directly mirrors these stages. It is a weighted composite score (0-100) designed to assess end-to-end AI agent quality across modalities- voice, text, and visual- aligned to how real conversations naturally unfold.  

    MAS Dimensions and Parameters 

    Conversation Stage  MAS Quality Dimension  What It Measures  Example Parameters
    Understanding  Agent Understanding Quality   how well the agent hears and understands the user (e.g., latency, interruptions, speech recognition accuracy)   Intent-determination, Interruption, missed window 
    Reasoning  Agent Reasoning Quality  how well the agent interprets intent and resolves the user’s request   Intent-resolution, acknowledgement 
    Response  Agent Response Quality  how well the agent responds, including tone, sentiment, and expressiveness    CSAT, Tone stability 

    Computing each MAS score:

    MAS is computed as a weighted aggregation of three quality dimensions stated in the table above. 

    where: 

    • Qj represents one of the three quality dimensions: Agent Understanding Quality (AUQ), Agent Reasoning Quality (ARQ)Agent Response Quality (AReQ)  
    • wj represent the costs or weights of each dimension 
    • αj captures the a priori probability of the respective dimension  

    Computing each MAS dimension: 

    Computing each MAS dimension (AUQ, ARQ, AReQ) involves aggregating underlying parameters into a single weighted score. Raw measurements (such as interruption, intent determination, or tone stability) are first normalized into a 0–1 score before aggregating them at the dimension level. We apply a linear normalization function clipping each raw measurement at predefined thresholds suitable for the parameter being measured (for example, maximum allowed interruption or minimum required accuracy). This maintains the sensitivity of each parameter in the relevant effective range and avoids the negative impact of measurement outliers, making MAS an absolute measure of agent quality. 

    MAS in Practice: Voice Agent Evaluation Example 

    To ground MAS in real-world conditions, we evaluated ~2,000 synthetic voice conversations across two agent configurations using identical prompts and scenarios: 

    • Agent-1: Chained voice agent using a three-stage ASR–LLM–TTS pipeline 
    • Agent-2: Real-time voice agent using direct speech-to-speech architecture  

    The evaluation dataset included noise, interruptions, accessibility effects, and vocal variability to simulate production environments.  

    Shown below is a comparison of core MAS metrics, including dimension-level scores and the overall MAS score. 

    Voice Evaluation Results (Excerpt) 

    Dimension  Parameters   Agent-1  Agent-2 
    AUQ  Interruption Rate (%)  0.045  0.025 
    AUQ  Missed Response Windows  0.00045  0.0015 
    ARQ  Intent Resolution  0.13  0.08 
    ARQ  Acknowledgement Quality  0.08  0.10 
    AReQ  CSAT  0.128  0.126 
    AReQ  Tone stability  0.16  0.14 

    Key Observations  

    MAS provides flexibility to surface quality insights at an aggregate level, while enabling deeper analysis at the individual parameter level. To better understand performance outliers and anomalous behaviors, we went beyond composite scores and analyzed agent quality at the individual parameter level. This deeper inspection allowed us to attribute observed degradations to specific factors: Example: 

    1. Channel quality matters: Communication channels introduce multiple challenge such as latency, interruptions, compression and loss of information, penalizing recognition and response quality. 
    1. Turn-taking quality is critical: Missed windows and interruptions strongly correlate with abandonment. 
    1. Tone and coherence matter: Cleaner audio and uninterrupted responses lead to higher acknowledgement and perceived empathy. 
    1. MAS reveals root causes: Differences in scores clearly distinguish understandingreasoning, and response failures-something single metrics cannot do. 

    Looking Forward 

    We will continue to refine and evolve MAS as we validate it against real-world deployments and business outcomes. As the Dynamics 365 Contact Center team, we aim to establish MAS as our quality benchmark for evaluating AI agents across channels. Over time, we also intend to make MAS broadly available, extensible, and pluggable, enabling organizations to adapt it, to evaluate their contact center agents across modalities. For readers interested in the underlying methodology and mathematical foundations, a detailed research paper will be published separately. 

    The post Evaluating AI Agents in Contact Centers: Introducing the Multi-modal Agents Score  appeared first on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Blog.

    Brought to you by Dr. Ware, Microsoft Office 365 Silver Partner, Charleston SC.