Power Platform MS Forms Quiz with dynamic Leader Board created using Power Automate and HTTP Trigger

by Contributed | Apr 29, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Here is an example Power Automate solution where we query a real SharePoint List acting as a Quiz Leader Board on my dev tenant and bring the contents to this very blog post (at the bottom of the page).  Using the Power Automate and the HTTP trigger we can retrieve, embed and display content from our Office 365 environments.

The competition is rife at the top of this Leader Board.  The aim is to get 100% and it is ordered by last completed to give everyone a chance to be top, albeit I am sorry to say that there is no official badge for this one. 

Want to test your Power Automate knowledge?   Click Here

For the first flow of two, using Microsoft Forms and Power Automate I have built a pretty standard process.  The user completes the quiz, the form gives them feedback on how well they have done and I capture the answers to a SharePoint List – seen below.

I use the when a new [form] response is submitted trigger and during the next couple of actions I calculate their score again (based on their answers) as the score is not passed back to the Cloud Flow via the Response Body.

What’s the Score?

In order to calculate the score I have created an array via a compose action and used the equals expression.  If the response equals the answer, it will return true.  I then use a filter action on the item() of each output from the select and filter on true.  This will leave me with an array of true values.  During the create item score field and tweet action, I use the length() expression (i.e. length of array from 10 possible true answers) to return the number of answers equaling true and multiply by 10 to get the percentage correct.

The final stage of this flow is a condition where I check to see if the user has supplied a twitter handle.  If it’s not empty I tweet out their score.  The only disappointment here is that Twitter will not let you tag users due to spamming  any attempt to include an @ result in it being stripped out.

The Leader Board

The interesting piece though, is the second flow, using the HTTP trigger action to present the leader board to the web and seen below (at least until my premium trial has not expired).  Using the trigger we can run an action to get items, prepare HTML table rows using a select action and send back a response to the website in a fraction of a second.  The end user loading the website almost doesn’t know it’s happening, albeit there is a slight delay for the flow to run, i’ll admit.  Did you notice the delay in this page loading?

The reponse to the embedded IFrame on my Blog and indeed this article which is simply calling the url provided by the HTTP Request trigger is an HTML table.  I create the table header and then using the select action body, I use the join() expression to join the elements of the array with ” into a string and complete the HTML table.

I’m not a web developer and I am sure that there will be slicker ways to embed the results of the http response into your site and for that I would be grateful to hear from those with experience but what do you think of this idea?  Are you on the leader board yet?  

As things stand – here is the leader board.  Can you resist not talking part?  Click Here

Tweets with your result will be posted via my twitter handle DamoBird365

Meanwhile, if you are looking for a certificate for your efforts, fill out my form here

Happy quizzing 

What's New from Ignite regarding Compliance Manager

by Contributed | Apr 29, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

This webinar covers the exciting announcements made at Ignite, as well as what’s next for Compliance Manager.

Watch on-demand 

Resources:

Microsoft Compliance Manager – Microsoft 365 Compliance | Microsoft Docs

Announcing general availability of Microsoft Compliance Manager – Microsoft Tech Community

This webinar was presented on April 20, 2021, and the recording can be found here .

Attached to this post are:

1. The FAQ document that summarizes the questions and answers that came up over the course of both webinars.


2. A PDF copy of the presentation.

Thanks to those of you who participated during the two sessions and if you haven’t already, don’t forget to check out our resources available on the Tech Community.

Thanks!

@Robin_Baldwin on behalf of the MIP and Compliance CXE team

What’s New in Microsoft Endpoint Manager – 2104 (April) Edition

by Contributed | Apr 29, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Protection on shared devices, Setup Assistant with modern authentication, and insights into OS health – What’s New in Microsoft Endpoint Manager – 2104 (April) Edition

This month, we’re releasing new capabilities that update the user experience across multiple platforms. You can view the complete list of What’s New in the 2104 (April) release for details. I previewed a few of these new capabilities at Ignite; now, they are here for you to use! As usual, I appreciate your feedback. Please feel free to comment on this post, connect with me on LinkedIn, or tag me @RamyaChitrakar on Twitter.

Protect privacy and data on Android Enterprise-managed devices shared by frontline workers

Frontline workers that share dedicated devices perform critical jobs like maintaining supply chains, serving as first responders, and caring for patients. This month we’re announcing general availability for IT to configure and enable users to enroll Android Enterprise dedicated devices into Azure AD Shared device mode. Organizations can now protect privacy and data on Android Enterprise managed devices shared between workers. I’m excited for the value the team is delivering to ensure that frontline workers have access to the tools and technology they need with the appropriate level of security, regardless of the device they may be on.

Shared device mode on Android Enterprise devices offers single sign-in, single sign-out, and data clearing across applications written to support multiple users. This manageability provides privacy between users and reduces the number of steps frontline workers need to take to work in their apps. Today, Microsoft applications optimized for Shared device mode include Microsoft Teams and Managed Home Screen. 

Here’s a frontline worker day in the life shared device experience from starting their shift to ending their day, all the while collaborating on Microsoft Teams:

More apps are coming soon; this is just the beginning. You can optimize your company’s private applications for Shared device mode by following our guide. When you configure an Android device with Shared device mode, you can also apply additional security measures such as Conditional Access policies to reduce the risk of unauthorized access to company data from shared devices while optimizing the experience for users. For example, you can manage the requirement for multi-factor authentication for users who may not carry their primary device during shifts.

Setup Assistant with modern authentication for Automated Device Enrollment on iOS/iPadOS/macOS

Many of you shared that you want a quick, secure, and easy authentication method that won’t stop employees from immediately starting to work for your purpose-driven iOS/iPadOS and macOS devices. This month, we released a public preview of Setup Assistant with modern authentication for Automated Device Enrollment. This new enrollment method allows your employees to start using these managed devices right after enrollment without waiting for the Company Portal to install on a locked down device.

With the security that comes with modern authentication, you can now configure your Azure AD settings within a Conditional Access policy to require multi-factor authentication either during enrollment in the Setup Assistant or upon authentication in the Company Portal. For apps that support it, you have a single sign-on experience while layering on your security and compliance requirements, if desired. Additionally, as part of this secure enrollment flow, if your user lands on the home screen post-enrollment and tries to open a resource protected by Conditional Access before signing into the Company Portal, we’ve added a user experience that will guide them through authentication. You can read more on how to configure these scenarios in this post.

Let’s look at Setup Assistant with modern authentication:

Windows restart frequency report in Endpoint Analytics

Finally, I previewed the Windows restart frequency feature in the Ignite Edition of What’s New. Since this is such a frequently asked for feature, I thought it important to share that this capability is generally available now for you to fully configure.

Use Endpoint analytics to measure and review device start-up time, restart frequency, and drill down on disruptive restarts, such as those caused by blue screens. The full power of analytics can also help you determine if a user has an abnormally high number of unexpected restarts, enabling you to more quickly troubleshoot and take appropriate action.

Here’s what the restart frequency looks like in the Microsoft Endpoint Manager admin center, and the following screen shot shows additional OS restart history:

We are always working with our customers’ needs top of mind. We listen to your feedback and make changes and investments based on your goals to improve the user experience as well as help simplify IT administration. Next month I expect you’ll see more focus on capabilities that improve the administrator experience. Questions? Feedback? Comment on this post, connect with me on LinkedIn, or tag me @RamyaChitrakar on Twitter.

Mastering Configuration in Defender for Office 365 – Part Two

by Contributed | Apr 29, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

This blog is part two of a three-part series detailing the journey we’re on to simplify the configuration of threat protection capabilities in Office 365 to enable best-in class protection for our customers.

In the previous blog in this series, we described how we have made it easier for customers to understand configurations gaps in their environment with recently launched features including Preset Security Policies, Configuration Analyzer, and Override Alerts. In this blog, we’ll take a closer look at additional capabilities we are enabling in the product as we continue forward on our journey to block malicious emails from being delivered to end users.

Secure by Default: Tackling the Legacy Override Problem

One of the challenges we are addressing is the legacy override problem. As we covered in the first blog, legacy overrides are tenant level or user level configuration that instruct Office 365 to deliver mail even when the system has determined that the message is suspicious or contains malicious content. As a result of these aging and overly permissive overrides, we get poorly protected pockets with the organization and enable malicious emails to be delivered to end users.

To combat this, we here at Microsoft believe it’s critical to keep our customers “secure by default”. We have determined that legacy overrides such as allowed sender and allowed domain lists in anti-spam policies and Safe Senders in Outlook tend to be too broad and cause more harm than good. As a security service, we believe it’s imperative that we act on your behalf to prevent your users from being compromised. That means these legacy overrides are no longer honored for email messages we believe are malicious. We already apply this approach with malware messages and now we are extending it to messages with high confidence phish verdicts. Our data also indicates that the false positive rate (good messages marked as bad) for high confidence phishing messages is extremely low, adding to our conviction about this approach.

This feels like a critical step, given how dangerous and voluminous phishing messages have become. To learn more about the current threat landscape, please check out our annual security intelligence report, the Microsoft Digital Defense Report.

Ensuring that users cannot interact with malicious emails

As part of our secure by default focus, we’ve also taken additional steps to eliminate the risk of email borne threats. Essentially, when Microsoft is confident that an email contains malicious content, we will not deliver the message to users, regardless of tenant configuration. These messages will be delivered to quarantine, not the junk folder. (In the junk folder, there is always the risk that the user might inadvertently release them to the inbox).

Only admins can manage malware or high confidence phish messages that are quarantined, because our data indicates that a user is 30 times more likely to click a malicious link in messages in the junk email folder versus quarantine.

Rolling out these secure by default changes

We’ve taken a very deliberate approach to rolling out these changes in phases to ensure customers are not surprised and there are no negative side effects. We began to rollout Secure by Default for high confidence phishing messages by the override type starting in December of last year.

Today, we’re at a point in our Secure by Default journey where the following overrides are not honored for malicious emails (malware or high confidence phish emails):

• Allowed sender lists or allowed domain lists (anti-spam policies)


• Outlook Safe Senders


• IP Allow List (connection filtering)

In addition, all malicious emails are delivered to quarantine by default.

Learn more about how we are keeping customers secure by visiting our documentation.

The Next Phase of Secure by Default rollout – Tackling transport rules

In June, we will extend Secure by Default to cover high confidence phishing messages for the remaining legacy override type, Exchange mail flow rules (also known as transport rules or ETRs).

ETRs represent roughly 60% of the high confidence phish message override volume we see, making this phase essential in achieving our Secure by Default goal for customers. For more on ETRs, check out our documentation on mail flow rules.

While ETRs represent a large problem space, it is complicated by the fact that customers and vendors have come to rely on it as a way to achieve two specific scenarios where the ‘override’ of malicious messages is quite deliberate and intentional.

1. Phish simulation campaigns: These are messages that Defender for Office 365 routinely detects as being malicious, so customers put ETR rules in place to direct the system to not block delivery of these messages to end users.


2. Security Operations mailboxes: These are special mailboxes customers setup to support the ability for end users to report malicious emails to SecOps teams.

In both these cases, customers do legitimately want the malicious emails delivered to achieve a very specific business goal.

So, in our effort to eliminate the unintentional ETR overrides of malicious emails, we needed to first make sure there was a say way for customers to achieve the above two goals without having to rely on ETRs as a blunt instrument.

Introducing Advanced Delivery for Phishing Simulations and Security Operations Mailboxes

As we covered above, there are special scenarios where security teams may want to explicitly direct that high confidence phish are delivered.

• Third-party phish simulations


• Security operations mailbox

Customers have asked us for a method to explicitly configure message delivery for these scenarios and for the ability to view and filter these messages across our admin experiences. In June, we will launch the new Advanced Delivery capability for these scenarios, providing a method for security admins to explicitly configure for these in-product.

Figure 1: Configuring Third-Party Phishing Simulation Campaigns with Advanced Delivery.

With Advanced Delivery, we will ensure messages configured as part of these scenarios are handled correctly across the product. The protection filters will respect these configurations and not block these messages. And we will also show off these messages with the appropriate annotations in all of the reporting, investigation and security experiences in the product, so security teams and admins are not confused about the true nature of these messages.

Since these do not represent a real threat to your organization, we will, for example, not flag the messages as malicious and inadvertently remove them from your inbox, and we’ll skip things like triggering alerts, detonation, and automated investigations. However, admins will have the ability to filter, analyze and understand messages delivered due to these special scenarios.

Figure 2: Configuring Security Operations Mailboxes with Advanced Delivery.

It will be important for customers who are utilizing ETRs to configure third-party party phishing simulation campaigns or delivery for security operation mailboxes today to start configuring these with the new Advanced Delivery policy when the feature is launched in June.

After the last phase of Secure by Default is enabled in July, Defender for Office 365 will no longer deliver high confidence phish, regardless of any explicit ETRs.

To learn more about the new advanced delivery policy, learn more on Microsoft Docs.

Making it easy for customers

This new way of handling phishing simulations from 3^rd party vendors and security operations mailboxes is cleaner and offers a great deal of predictability for security teams. We’ve seen numerous occasions where security admins and SecOps members have been stirred into action inadvertently because of lack of clarity in this regard. This new capability above eliminates all that confusion.

Most significantly, this feature makes it easier for security and messaging admins to rest assured that their ETR rules cannot impact the protection of their users, and prevents them from having to manually inspect all of their ETR rules (a daunting task) to guarantee that.

Stay tuned…

We covered here additional changes we’ve made to help customers understand configuration gaps and the capabilities we’ve launched to eliminate the legacy override problem. In the next blog, we will share details about additional features we are building to further eliminate the configuration gap problem in the case where customers may be unaware of security policy features available to them and have not turned these on.

Do you have questions or feedback about Microsoft Defender for Office 365? Engage with the community and Microsoft experts in the Defender for Office 365 forum.