Intune Support Tip: Managing Compliance on HoloLens 2 with Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Intune Support Tip: Managing Compliance on HoloLens 2 with Microsoft Endpoint Manager

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

By Per Larsen – Sr. Program Manager | Microsoft Endpoint Manager – Intune


 


How to manage compliance policies on HoloLens devices is one of the most common questions we get from customers as they start to manage their HoloLens fleet with Microsoft Endpoint Manager.


 


Compliance policies are used to mark the device compliant or non-compliant, which can be used in conjunction with Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Conditional Access to allow or block access to corporate data.


 


Microsoft Intune as a capability of Endpoint Manager, uses Configuration Service Providers (CSPs) to control and verify many of the settings in the compliance policy, so those CSP’s need to be supported on the HoloLens. You can find out more about supported CSPs in the Policies in Policy CSP supported by HoloLens 2 document.


 









Note:


 


Configuration Manager Compliance is not supported with Hololens devices. The ConfigMgr agent is a Win32 app, and Win32 apps cannot run on a HoloLens device.


 


HoloLens 2 runs the Windows Holographic Operating System, which is not the same as Windows 10 Desktop, and therefore some capabilities (like win32 apps) do not exist in this platform.

 


The same compliance policy is used for Windows 10 desktop and HoloLens in Microsoft Intune, however some settings supported for Windows 10 are not available for HoloLens. This is similar to how BitLocker and HoloLens work.


 


HoloLens 2 has BitLocker Device Encryption enabled automatically on the operating system and fixed data volumes and cannot be turned off – even by IT administrators – so that the device is always protected.


 


Settings available for HoloLens:





























































































































































 

Can you use the profile?

Device Health


  

Require BitLocker

Not applicable

Require Secure Boot to be enabled on the device

Not applicable

Require code integrity

Not applicable

Device Properties


  

Operating System Version

Yes

Minimum OS version

Yes

Maximum OS version

Yes

Minimum OS version for mobile devices

Not applicable

Maximum OS version for mobile devices

Not applicable

Valid operating system builds

Yes

Configuration Manager Compliance


  

Require device compliance from Configuration Manager

Not applicable

System Security

 

Password

 

Require a password to unlock mobile devices

Yes

Simple passwords

Yes

Password type

Yes

Minimum password length

Yes

Maximum minutes of inactivity before password is required

Not applicable

Password expiration (days)

Yes

Number of previous passwords to prevent reuse

Yes

Require password when device returns from idle state (Mobile and Holographic)

Yes

Require encryption of data storage on device.

Not applicable

Device Security

 

Firewall

*

Trusted Platform Module (TPM)

Yes

Antivirus

Not applicable

Antispyware

Not applicable

Defender

 

Microsoft Defender Antimalware

*

Microsoft Defender Antimalware minimum version

*

Microsoft Defender Antimalware security intelligence up-to-date

*

Real-time protection

*

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

 

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint rules


  

Require the device to be at or under the machine risk score

*

 


Can you use the profile?


Yes = The settings will work on HoloLens


Not applicable = Will show as Not applicable in the compliance status


* = Settings are not included in the supported list of CSP for Windows Holographic for Business


 


How to deploy a compliance policy to HoloLens


Scenarios drive whether you deploy your compliance policy to users in user groups or devices in device groups. When a compliance policy is deployed to a user, all the user’s devices are checked for compliance.


 


Example Scenario 1


Let’s take a HoloLens device that is enrolled into Intune by the Windows Autopilot self-deploying mode process and automatically put in KIOSK mode. When onboarded with Autopilot the device is enrolled . In this case, we recommend deploying your compliance policy to a device group. This can be done with an Azure AD static or dynamic group. You can populate a dynamic group with HoloLens devices by using a device attribute where “Model” is “HoloLens 2” or by a Group Tag set on the Autopilot object.


 


Example Scenario 2


You have a group of users that use both Windows 10 Desktop devices and HoloLens 2 devices. In this case, the same Intune compliance policy will be applicable to both devices. It therefore makes sense to deploy your compliance policy to a user group. Any setting that is not applicable on the HoloLens 2 can mark the device non-complaint.


 


Create the compliance policy


First, create a Filter to include or exclude HoloLens 2 devices when using user-based targeting:



  1. Navigate to Tenant admin > Filters (preview) > Create, choose a Filter name.

  2. From the Platform dropdown field, select “Windows 10” and click Next.

    HoloLens2-Blog-1.png


  3. Complete the Rules section as follows, then click Next.

    • Property = Model

    • Operator = Equals

    • Value = HoloLens 2

      HoloLens2-Blog-2.png




  4. Lastly, assign Scope tags if required, review your configuration, and then click Create.


 









Note:


 


Read more about assignment filters in our Create filters in Microsoft Intune documentation.

 


Next, create the associated compliance policy:



  1. Navigate to Devices > Windows > Compliance policies and select Create Policy.

  2. Start by creating a simple compliance policy for your HoloLens devices, such as the following example:

    HoloLens2-Blog-3.png



Note that there is no primary user when a HoloLens 2 device is onboarded with Autopilot for HoloLens, as shown in the following image:


 


HoloLens2-Blog-4.png


 


If a primary user is not identified, no one will receive an email if the compliance state of the device changes from compliant to non-compliant. You can change this by setting a primary user on the device so that Intune can send an email notification:



  1. Navigate Devices > Windows and find the device you want to assign a primary user to.

  2. Select Properties, click on Change Primary user, and then select the relevant user that will receive the non-compliant notification emails.

    HoloLens2-Blog-5.png


Conclusion


As new device types like HoloLens enter your endpoint estate, it’s critical that these devices are compliant with your corporate security policies to protect organizational data. Use these policies with Conditional Access to allow or block access to company resources for HoloLens 2 devices.


 


More info and feedback


For further resources on this subject, please see the links below.


Manage and use different device management features on Windows Holographic and HoloLens devices with Intune


Enroll HoloLens in MDM


Windows Autopilot for HoloLens 2


 


Let us know if you have any additional questions by replying to this post or reaching out to @IntuneSuppTeam  on Twitter. 

Certifications can spark confidence amidst unexpected changes

Certifications can spark confidence amidst unexpected changes

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

While the pandemic has slowed down many aspects of life, research shows that the last 18 months has accelerated digitization and the tech employment market. By 2025, Microsoft estimates that 149 million new jobs will be added in technology industries. Leading those gains will be 98 million new software development jobs and 23 million cloud and data roles.1


 


To help those around the world prepare for this growth, Microsoft’s skills initiative offers free training content and discounted certifications, and has helped over 30 million people in 249 countries and territories gain access to essential digital skills. As part of our ongoing #ProudToBeCertified blog series, we’d like to introduce you to Ricardo Lessa and how he went beyond personal advancement during the COVID crisis.


 


 


Ricardo: Helping others starts with helping yourself


Ricardo Lessa has a history of resilience and self-motivation. When he came out of the datacenter, Ricardo launched his career as an entrepreneur. For about a decade, he ran his own company until the pandemic struck in 2020. When the pandemic started, “My sources of income were literally cut off,” says Ricardo. He was forced to close his business. Searching for new opportunities, a Microsoft MVP and colleague introduced him to the power of certification through Microsoft Learn.


 


Making the most of available resources, Ricardo was able to earn Microsoft Certifications that helped him land a job as a pre-sales engineer. And that’s just the beginning. Certification is more than a credential; it’s a personal confidence builder, as Ricardo explains, “the term ‘proud to be’ is the sense of accomplishment for getting the job done, for having completed a stage, for having progressed, for truly scoring a win. And, on a personal level, it greatly improves our focus, our discipline and, consequently, our results.”


 


Ricardo was inspired by how his colleague’s advice had made a real impact on his career. So, they joined forces and found a way to help others in similar circumstances. “This situation and its demands inspired us to do something new – something unique,” he says. And together, they began a new technical support community: CloudExpert, an online network of support, training, and resources for professionals designed to get members trained to progress on their career paths. The goal of this network is to help peers rekindle their dreams and get back in the job market sooner than later.


 


By creating this new support system for others, Ricardo discovered more about himself than he ever imagined. “I was able to believe again in the possibility of starting over,” Ricardo says, “updating myself and returning to the IT market. I dreamed that I could influence others so that they can overcome hardship and believe in a new beginning. And it happened!”


 


WWL_Blog_P2BC_COVID_InBlog_Quote_Ricardo.png


 


Share your #ProudToBeCertified stories and opportunities


Like Ricardo’s initiative, the Microsoft Certification community can help you and your peers move forward, no matter how the world changes around you. Keep an eye out for more stories in this #ProudToBeCertified blog series and the latest videos – where people like you are dedicating themselves to continuing education to get an edge in our competitive and changing market.


 


Have a Microsoft Certifications story to share? We’d love to hear how you got started on your path, where it took you, the obstacles you overcame, or the confidence you gained from earning your first or fifteenth certification. Submit your own on Twitter, LinkedIn, or your preferred platform with #ProudToBeCertified.


 


Related posts:


 



 


1Microsoft Data Science, utilizing LinkedIn Data. Methodology and assumptions can be found in the white paper “Methodology: Digitization Capacity of the World Economy.”


2Official Microsoft Blog, “Building a more inclusive skills-based economy: The next steps for our global skills initiative,” Brad Smith, March 30, 2021


 

Threat & vulnerability management integrates with ServiceNow VR

Threat & vulnerability management integrates with ServiceNow VR

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Most enterprises rely on a multitude of vendors, security solutions, and IT tools to combat advanced cyber-attacks. At Microsoft, we believe that when these solutions work well together, customers benefit and can build stronger defenses.


That’s why we are excited to announce the general availability of a new integration between Microsoft threat and vulnerability management and ServiceNow Vulnerability Response (VR). The integration between these two products gives customers more flexibility in managing the end- to-end workflow of their vulnerability management program and aims to:


 



  • Optimize vulnerability prioritization

  • Automate response workflows

  • Speed up overall time to remediation


ServiceNow’s VR module ingests asset information, data of open and fixed vulnerabilities, as well as recommendations from Microsoft threat and vulnerability management. It syncs these findings into VR tables and data structures, where vulnerabilities are matched against existing assets in your CMDB or creates a new Configuration Item (CI) if no match is found. The integration leverages standard Vulnerability Response data import and CI reconciliation methods.


 


Image 1: Vulnerability Response Workflow DiagramImage 1: Vulnerability Response Workflow Diagram


 


 


The diagram above shows the import of vulnerability assessment content from Microsoft threat and vulnerability management into ServiceNow VR to orchestrate the remediation workflow of vulnerabilities.


Once ServiceNow VR has ingested information from Microsoft threat and vulnerability management, security teams can start with a top-level view of the ingested data or dive deep using various views. Some of the available views include vulnerability groups, vulnerable items, and security recommendations taken directly from Microsoft threat and vulnerability management. 


 


Image 2: Integration run status dashboardImage 2: Integration run status dashboard


 


Image 2 shows an all-up integration run status and details of how much data has been ingested over the last 30 days. The included timeline shows performance metrics over the same period.


 


Image 3: Overview of ingested vulnerable itemsImage 3: Overview of ingested vulnerable items


 


Image 4: Overview of Microsoft threat and vulnerability management security recommendationsImage 4: Overview of Microsoft threat and vulnerability management security recommendations


 


As part of the remediation workflow, ServiceNow VR prioritizes vulnerabilities using asset and business context, along with vulnerability risk scores. The risk score and rating take the vulnerability information and configuration item into account. Security teams can customize the risk calculator based on their organization’s preferences and requirements, optimizing the prioritization of vulnerabilities.


 


Users can then investigate each vulnerability and associated details within the ServiceNow console.


 


Image 5: Details view of vulnerable itemsImage 5: Details view of vulnerable items


 


Lastly, ServiceNow VR provides a grouping of vulnerabilities based on the Microsoft recommendations and automatically assigns tickets to the relevant IT owners and sets the SLAs using predefined rules. This enables customers to use existing workflows and established processes in their organization and create an end-to-end process across the vulnerability management program.


The integration between Microsoft threat and vulnerability management and ServiceNow VR can help security teams create more automated remediation workflows and drive efficiencies with their IT counterparts.


 


An added focus on interoperability


Microsoft threat and vulnerability management APIs empower security teams to deliver greater value to their vulnerability management program. The set of APIs that was used to build the ServiceNow integration gives customers and partners full access to the threat and vulnerability management dataset, including:


 



  • Vulnerability assessment

  • Security configuration assessment

  • Software inventory for all devices


If you want to know how to use these APIs to create custom reports, build automations, and more, check out this blog post.


As we continue to expand the depth and breadth of Microsoft’s vulnerability management capabilities, our team is focused on building a broad ecosystem of integration partners. We understand that our customers have existing investments and established processes to run their security and IT operations and we want to ensure our products support these requirements. If you would like to see additional integrations within Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, go to the Partner Application page in the Microsoft Defender Security Center, and click Recommend other partners.


 


More information and feedback


New authentication scope for multi-factor authentication

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Last year, we started requiring multi-factor authentication in Microsoft Advertising online. Multi-factor authentication is a security process that requires you to verify your identity in two different ways.


 


We’ll soon require multi-factor authentication for all users who sign in through a third-party application that uses the Bing Ads API. Because security is important and we want to ensure there is enough time for full participation, we’ve set the enforcement date to March 1st, 2022.


 


Action required 


 


You must update your application and prompt users for consent using “msads.manage” scope via the Microsoft identity platform endpoint. All Microsoft Advertising developers must take action to use the new scope.  


 


With each API request we will check the access token to ensure the user granted consent via the new “msads.manage” scope. Upon enforcement of multi-factor authentication, any access token provisioned otherwise won’t be accepted.


 


We recommend that you make the necessary changes as soon as possible.


 
SDK support 


 


Support for the new “msads.manage scope” is added with Bing Ads SDKs (NET, Java, Python, and PHP) version 13.0.10 released this month. 


 


The new “msads.manage” scope is now used by default in all SDKs. For backwards compatibility you can temporarily use “ads.manage” or “bingads.manage” with a small code change. 


 


 

var oAuthDesktopMobileAuthCodeGrant = new OAuthDesktopMobileAuthCodeGrant(
    Settings.Default["ClientId"].ToString(),
    apiEnvironment,
    OAuthScope.ADS_MANAGE // temporary workaround
);

 


 


For more information, see our API documentation. As always please feel free to contact support or post a question in the Bing Ads API developer forum.  


 

Build serverless, full stack applications in Azure

Build serverless, full stack applications in Azure

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Whether you’re new or seasoned to cloud, development, and SQL, building and architecting applications in the cloud has become a required skill for many roles. We recently announced a new learning path to help developers of all skill levels learn how to create applications quickly and effectively with Azure. The new learning path is Build serverless, full stack applications in Azure.


 


In this learning path, you’ll learn how to create, build, and deploy modern full stack applications in Azure leveraging the language of your choice (Python, Node.js, or .NET) and with a Vue.js frontend. Topics covered include modern database capabilities, CI/CD and DevOps, backend API development, REST, and more. Using a real-world scenario of trying to catch the bus, you will learn how to build a solution that integrates Azure SQL Database, Azure Functions, Azure Static Web Apps, Logic Apps, Visual Studio Code and GitHub Actions.


 


catch-the-bus.png


 


 


In addition to this new learning path which allows you to get hands on for FREE in Microsoft Learn’s Azure sandbox, Davide Mauri and myself, who built the learning path, presented this content as part of Microsoft Build in May, and you can access the recording here.


 

If you aren’t interested in completing all of the modules, but want to dive into a specific topic, the modules are standalone, and you can learn at your own pace. Here are the modules:



  1. Architect modern applications using Azure SQL Database

  2. Deploy serverless APIs with Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and Azure SQL Database

  3. Build full stack applications with Azure Static Web Apps and Azure SQL Database

  4. Architect full-stack applications and automate deployments with GitHub


 


If you want more content like this, I recommend checking out Azure SQL Fundamentals and subscribing to Data Exposed where we have mini-series like Azure SQL for beginners, Migrating to SQL, and more! If you have other questions or feedback, please reach out to me on Twitter @AnalyticAnna.

Vulnerability Summary for the Week of June 14, 2021

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Security, Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

ubuntu — ubuntu It was discovered that the process_report() function in data/whoopsie-upload-all allowed arbitrary file writes via symlinks. 2021-06-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32557
MISC 74cms — 74cms SQL Injection in 74cms 3.2.0 via the key parameter to plus/ajax_street.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22211
MISC 74cms — 74cms SQL Injection in 74cms 3.2.0 via the query parameter to plus/ajax_common.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22209
MISC 74cms — 74cms
  SQL Injection in 74cms 3.2.0 via the id parameter to wap/wap-company-show.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22212
MISC 74cms — 74cms
  SQL Injection in 74cms 3.2.0 via the x parameter to plus/ajax_street.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22208
MISC 74cms — 74cms
  SQL Injection in 74cms 3.2.0 via the x parameter to ajax_officebuilding.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22210
MISC advantech — webaccess/scada
  Advantech WebAccess/SCADA Versions 9.0.1 and prior is vulnerable to redirection, which may allow an attacker to send a maliciously crafted URL that could result in redirecting a user to a malicious webpage. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32956
MISC advantech — webaccess/scada
  Advantech WebAccess/SCADA Versions 9.0.1 and prior is vulnerable to a directory traversal, which may allow an attacker to remotely read arbitrary files on the file system. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32954
MISC apache — chainsaw
  A deserialization flaw was found in Apache Chainsaw versions prior to 2.1.0 which could lead to malicious code execution. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-9493
MISC
MLIST
MLIST apache — cxf
  A vulnerability in the JsonMapObjectReaderWriter of Apache CXF allows an attacker to submit malformed JSON to a web service, which results in the thread getting stuck in an infinite loop, consuming CPU indefinitely. This issue affects Apache CXF versions prior to 3.4.4; Apache CXF versions prior to 3.3.11. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-30468
CONFIRM
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST apache — http_server
  Apache HTTP Server protocol handler for the HTTP/2 protocol checks received request headers against the size limitations as configured for the server and used for the HTTP/1 protocol as well. On violation of these restrictions and HTTP response is sent to the client with a status code indicating why the request was rejected. This rejection response was not fully initialised in the HTTP/2 protocol handler if the offending header was the very first one received or appeared in a a footer. This led to a NULL pointer dereference on initialised memory, crashing reliably the child process. Since such a triggering HTTP/2 request is easy to craft and submit, this can be exploited to DoS the server. This issue affected mod_http2 1.15.17 and Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.47 only. Apache HTTP Server 2.4.47 was never released. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31618
MISC
MISC
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
FEDORA
FEDORA apache — pdfbox
  In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions. 2021-06-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31812
MISC
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST apache — pdfbox
  In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions. 2021-06-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31811
MISC
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST
MLIST apollos_apps — apollos_apps
  Apollos Apps is an open source platform for launching church-related apps. In Apollos Apps versions prior to 2.20.0, new user registrations are able to access anyone’s account by only knowing their basic profile information (name, birthday, gender, etc). This includes all app functionality within the app, as well as any authenticated links to Rock-based webpages (such as giving and events). There is a patch in version 2.20.0. As a workaround, one can patch one’s server by overriding the `create` data source method on the `People` class. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32691
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM bandai — namco_fromsoftware_dark_souls_iii
  Bandai Namco FromSoftware Dark Souls III allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34170
MISC bosch — multiple_products A use after free in hermes, while emitting certain error messages, prior to commit d86e185e485b6330216dee8e854455c694e3a36e allows attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code via crafted JavaScript. Note that this is only exploitable if the application using Hermes permits evaluation of untrusted JavaScript. Hence, most React Native applications are not affected. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24037
CONFIRM
CONFIRM bosch — multiple_products
  When using http protocol, the user password is transmitted as a clear text parameter for which it is possible to be obtained by an attacker through a MITM attack. This will be fixed starting from Firmware version 3.11.5, which will be released on the 30th of June, 2021. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23846
CONFIRM bosch — multiple_products
  This vulnerability could allow an attacker to hijack a session while a user is logged in the configuration web page. This vulnerability was discovered by a security researcher in B426 and found during internal product tests in B426-CN/B429-CN, and B426-M and has been fixed already starting from version 3.08 on, which was released on June 2019. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23845
CONFIRM captive_portal — captive_portal
  An authenticated Stored XSS (Cross-site Scripting) exists in the “captive.cgi” Captive Portal via the “Title of Login Page” text box or “TITLE” parameter in IPFire 2.21 (x86_64) – Core Update 130. It allows an authenticated WebGUI user with privileges to execute Stored Cross-site Scripting in the Captive Portal page. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2020-19202
MISC
MISC checksec — canopy
  CheckSec Canopy before 3.5.2 allows XSS attacks against the login page via the LOGIN_PAGE_DISCLAIMER parameter. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34815
MISC
MISC
MISC cisco — advanced_malware_protection
  A vulnerability in the Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints integration of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) and Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to intercept traffic between an affected device and the AMP servers. This vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation when an affected device establishes TLS connections. A man-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to spoof a trusted host and then extract sensitive information or alter certain API requests. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1566
CISCO cisco — anyconnect_secure_mobility_client
  A vulnerability in the DLL loading mechanism of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL hijacking attack on an affected device if the VPN Posture (HostScan) Module is installed on the AnyConnect client. This vulnerability is due to a race condition in the signature verification process for DLL files that are loaded on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a series of crafted interprocess communication (IPC) messages to the AnyConnect process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected device with SYSTEM privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials on the Windows system. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1567
CISCO cisco — anyconnect_secure_mobility_client
  A vulnerability in Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to uncontrolled memory allocation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by copying a crafted file to a specific folder on the system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to crash the VPN Agent service when the affected application is launched, causing it to be unavailable to all users of the system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials on a multiuser Windows system. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1568
CISCO cisco — jabber
  Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Jabber for Windows, Cisco Jabber for Mac, and Cisco Jabber for mobile platforms could allow an attacker to access sensitive information or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1570
CISCO cisco — jabber
  Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Jabber for Windows, Cisco Jabber for Mac, and Cisco Jabber for mobile platforms could allow an attacker to access sensitive information or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1569
CISCO cisco — meeting_server
  A vulnerability in the API of Cisco Meeting Server could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because requests that are sent to the API are not properly validated. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to the API. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause all participants on a call to be disconnected, resulting in a DoS condition. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1524
CISCO cisco — small_business_220_series_smart_switches
  Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an attacker to do the following: Hijack a user session Execute arbitrary commands as a root user on the underlying operating system Conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack Conduct an HTML injection attack For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1543
CISCO cisco — small_business_220_series_smart_switches
  Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an attacker to do the following: Hijack a user session Execute arbitrary commands as a root user on the underlying operating system Conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack Conduct an HTML injection attack For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1542
CISCO cisco — small_business_220_series_smart_switches
  Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an attacker to do the following: Hijack a user session Execute arbitrary commands as a root user on the underlying operating system Conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack Conduct an HTML injection attack For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1571
CISCO cisco — small_business_220_series_smart_switches
  Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches could allow an attacker to do the following: Hijack a user session Execute arbitrary commands as a root user on the underlying operating system Conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack Conduct an HTML injection attack For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1541
CISCO cisco — unified_intelligence_center
  A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-1395
CISCO citrix — adc_and_netscaler_gateway
  Citrix ADC and Citrix/NetScaler Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-76.29, 12.1-61.18, 11.1-65.20, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.238, and Citrix SD-WAN WANOP Edition before 11.4.0, 11.3.2, 11.3.1a, 11.2.3a, 11.1.2c, 10.2.9a suffers from uncontrolled resource consumption by way of a network-based denial-of-service from within the same Layer 2 network segment. Note that the attacker must be in the same Layer 2 network segment as the vulnerable appliance. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-8299
MISC citrix — adc_and_netscaler_gateway
  Citrix ADC and Citrix/NetScaler Gateway before 13.0-82.41, 12.1-62.23, 11.1-65.20 and Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.238 suffer from improper access control allowing SAML authentication hijack through a phishing attack to steal a valid user session. Note that Citrix ADC or Citrix Gateway must be configured as a SAML SP or a SAML IdP for this to be possible. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-8300
MISC citrix — cloud_connector
  Citrix Cloud Connector before 6.31.0.62192 suffers from insecure storage of sensitive information due to sensitive information being stored in the Citrix Cloud Connector installation log files. Such information could be used by an malicious actor to access a Citrix Cloud environment. This issue affects all versions of Citrix Cloud Connector that were installed by passing secure client parameters for installation via the command line. The issue does not affect Citrix Cloud Connector if it was installed using the interactive installer or where a parameter file was used with the command-line installer. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22914
MISC civicrm — civicrm
  In CiviCRM before 5.21.3 and 5.22.x through 5.24.x before 5.24.3, users may be able to upload and execute a crafted PHAR archive. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2020-36388
MISC civicrm — civicrm
  In CiviCRM before 5.28.1 and CiviCRM ESR before 5.27.5 ESR, the CKEditor configuration form allows CSRF. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2020-36389
MISC cleo — lexicom
  An issue was discovered in Cleo LexiCom 5.5.0.0. The requirement for the sender of an AS2 message to identify themselves (via encryption and signing of the message) can be bypassed by changing the Content-Type of the message to text/plain. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33577
MISC
MISC cleo — lexicom
  An issue was discovered in Cleo LexiCom 5.5.0.0. Within the AS2 message, the sender can specify a filename. This filename can include path-traversal characters, allowing the file to be written to an arbitrary location on disk. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33576
MISC
MISC connectwise — automate
  An issue was discovered in ConnectWise Automate before 2021.5. A blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in core agent inventory communication that can enable an attacker to extract database information or administrative credentials from an instance via crafted monitor status responses. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32582
MISC
MISC
MISC contiki-ng — contiki-ng Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for internet of things devices. A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Contiki-NG versions prior to 4.6. After establishing a TCP socket using the tcp-socket library, it is possible for the remote end to send a packet with a data offset that is unvalidated. The problem has been patched in Contiki-NG 4.6. Users can apply the patch for this vulnerability out-of-band as a workaround. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21281
MISC
CONFIRM contiki-ng — contiki-ng Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for internet of things devices. In versions prior to 4.5, buffer overflow can be triggered by an input packet when using either of Contiki-NG’s two RPL implementations in source-routing mode. The problem has been patched in Contiki-NG 4.5. Users can apply the patch for this vulnerability out-of-band as a workaround. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21282
MISC
CONFIRM contiki-ng — contiki-ng
  Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for internet of things devices. It is possible to cause an out-of-bounds write in versions of Contiki-NG prior to 4.6 when transmitting a 6LoWPAN packet with a chain of extension headers. Unfortunately, the written header is not checked to be within the available space, thereby making it possible to write outside the buffer. The problem has been patched in Contiki-NG 4.6. Users can apply the patch for this vulnerability out-of-band as a workaround. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21280
MISC
CONFIRM contiki-ng — contiki-ng
  Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for internet of things devices. In verions prior to 4.6, an attacker can perform a denial-of-service attack by triggering an infinite loop in the processing of IPv6 neighbor solicitation (NS) messages. This type of attack can effectively shut down the operation of the system because of the cooperative scheduling used for the main parts of Contiki-NG and its communication stack. The problem has been patched in Contiki-NG 4.6. Users can apply the patch for this vulnerability out-of-band as a workaround. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21279
CONFIRM contiki-ng — contiki-ng
  Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for internet of things devices. The RPL-Classic and RPL-Lite implementations in the Contiki-NG operating system versions prior to 4.6 do not validate the address pointer in the RPL source routing header This makes it possible for an attacker to cause out-of-bounds writes with packets injected into the network stack. Specifically, the problem lies in the rpl_ext_header_srh_update function in the two rpl-ext-header.c modules for RPL-Classic and RPL-Lite respectively. The addr_ptr variable is calculated using an unvalidated CMPR field value from the source routing header. An out-of-bounds write can be triggered on line 151 in os/net/routing/rpl-lite/rpl-ext-header.c and line 261 in os/net/routing/rpl-classic/rpl-ext-header.c, which contain the following memcpy call with addr_ptr as destination. The problem has been patched in Contiki-NG 4.6. Users can apply a patch out-of-band as a workaround. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21257
MISC
CONFIRM contiki-ng — contiki-ng
  Contiki-NG is an open-source, cross-platform operating system for Next-Generation IoT devices. An out-of-bounds read can be triggered by 6LoWPAN packets sent to devices running Contiki-NG 4.6 and prior. The IPv6 header decompression function (<code>uncompress_hdr_iphc</code>) does not perform proper boundary checks when reading from the packet buffer. Hence, it is possible to construct a compressed 6LoWPAN packet that will read more bytes than what is available from the packet buffer. As of time of publication, there is not a release with a patch available. Users can apply the patch for this vulnerability out-of-band as a workaround. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21410
CONFIRM
MISC curl — curl
  curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol. 2021-06-11 not yet calculated CVE-2021-22898
MISC
MISC
MISC
MLIST d-link — dir-2640-us D-Link DIR-2640-US 1.01B04 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. There are multiple out-of-bounds vulnerabilities in some processes of D-Link AC2600(DIR-2640). Local ordinary users can overwrite the global variables in the .bss section, causing the process crashes or changes. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34201
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC d-link — dir-2640-us
  D-Link DIR-2640-US 1.01B04 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Router ac2600 (dir-2640-us), when setting PPPoE, will start quagga process in the way of whole network monitoring, and this function uses the original default password and port. An attacker can easily use telnet to log in, modify routing information, monitor the traffic of all devices under the router, hijack DNS and phishing attacks. In addition, this interface is likely to be questioned by customers as a backdoor, because the interface should not be exposed. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34203
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC d-link — dir-2640-us
  There are multiple out-of-bounds vulnerabilities in some processes of D-Link AC2600(DIR-2640) 1.01B04. Ordinary permissions can be elevated to administrator permissions, resulting in local arbitrary code execution. An attacker can combine other vulnerabilities to further achieve the purpose of remote code execution. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34202
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC d-link — dir-2640-us
  D-Link DIR-2640-US 1.01B04 is affected by Insufficiently Protected Credentials. D-Link AC2600(DIR-2640) stores the device system account password in plain text. It does not use linux user management. In addition, the passwords of all devices are the same, and they cannot be modified by normal users. An attacker can easily log in to the target router through the serial port and obtain root privileges. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34204
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC db2 — db2
  Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes Db2 Connect Server) 11.1.4 and 11.5.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service as the server terminates abnormally when executing a specially crafted SELECT statement. IBM X-Force ID: 200658. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-29702
XF
CONFIRM dedecms — dedecms
  SQL Injection vulnerability in DedeCMS 5.7 via mdescription parameter to member/ajax_membergroup.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22198
MISC
MISC dell — poweredge Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and T640 Server BIOS contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with NVDIMM-N installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, arbitrary code execution, or information disclosure in UEFI or BIOS Preboot Environment. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21556
CONFIRM dell — poweredge Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and T640 Server BIOS contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with NVDIMM-N installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, arbitrary code execution, or information disclosure in UEFI or BIOS Preboot Environment. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21555
CONFIRM dell — poweredge
  Dell PowerEdge R640, R740, R740XD, R840, R940, R940xa, MX740c, MX840c, and, Dell Precision 7920 Rack Workstation BIOS contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in systems with Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory installed. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of Service, arbitrary code execution, or information disclosure in UEFI or BIOS Preboot Environment. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21554
CONFIRM dell — poweredge_server_bios_andPrecision_rack_bios
  Dell PowerEdge Server BIOS and select Dell Precision Rack BIOS contain an out-of-bounds array access vulnerability. A local malicious user with high privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a denial of service, arbitrary code execution, or information disclosure in System Management Mode. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21557
CONFIRM ecshop — ecshop SQL Injection in ECShop 3.0 via the id parameter to admin/shophelp.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22205
MISC ecshop — ecshop SQL Injection in ECShop 3.0 via the aid parameter to admin/affiliate_ck.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22206
MISC ecshop — ecshop
  SQL Injection in ECShop 2.7.6 via the goods_number parameter to flow.php. . 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22204
MISC eip — stack_group_opener
  An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Ethernet/IP UDP handler functionality of EIP Stack Group OpENer 2.3 and development commit 8c73bf3. A specially crafted network request can lead to an out-of-bounds read. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21777
MISC elemin — elemin
  Elemin allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary PHP code via the Themify framework (before 1.2.2) wp-content/themes/elemin/themify/themify-ajax.php file. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2013-20002
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC elfinder — elfinder
  elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Several vulnerabilities affect elFinder 2.1.58. These vulnerabilities can allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code and commands on the server hosting the elFinder PHP connector, even with minimal configuration. The issues were patched in version 2.1.59. As a workaround, ensure the connector is not exposed without authentication. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32682
MISC
CONFIRM enphase — envoy An issue was discovered on Enphase Envoy R3.x and D4.x devices. There is a custom PAM module for user authentication that circumvents traditional user authentication. This module uses a password derived from the MD5 hash of the username and serial number. The serial number can be retrieved by an unauthenticated user at /info.xml. Attempts to change the user password via passwd or other tools have no effect. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25754
MISC
MISC
MISC enphase — envoy
  An issue was discovered on Enphase Envoy R3.x and D4.x devices with v3 software. The default admin password is set to the last 6 digits of the serial number. The serial number can be retrieved by an unauthenticated user at /info.xml. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25753
MISC
MISC
MISC enphase — envoy
  An issue was discovered on Enphase Envoy R3.x and D4.x devices. There are hardcoded web-panel login passwords for the installer and Enphase accounts. The passwords for these accounts are hardcoded values derived from the MD5 hash of the username and serial number mixed with some static strings. The serial number can be retrieved by an unauthenticated user at /info.xml. These passwords can be easily calculated by an attacker; users are unable to change these passwords. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25752
MISC
MISC
MISC enphase — envoy
  An issue was discovered on Enphase Envoy R3.x and D4.x (and other current) devices. The upgrade_start function in /installer/upgrade_start allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via the force parameter. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25755
MISC
MISC
MISC excellent_infotek_corporation — e-document_system
  An issue was discovered in EXCELLENT INFOTEK CORPORATION (EIC) E-document System 3.0. A remote attacker can use kw/auth/bbs/asp/get_user_email_info_bbs.asp to obtain the contact information (name and e-mail address) of everyone in the entire organization. This information can allow remote attackers to perform social engineering or brute force attacks against the system login page. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34683
MISC
MISC fiyo — cms
  In Fiyo CMS 2.0.6.1, the ‘tag’ parameter results in an unauthenticated XSS attack. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2020-35373
MISC fogproject — fogproject
  FOGProject v1.5.9 is affected by a File Upload RCE (Authenticated). 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32243
MISC foxit — phantompdf
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13531. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31476
MISC
MISC ge — reason_rpv311
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GE Reason RPV311 14A03. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firmware and filesystem of the device. The firmware and filesystem contain hard-coded default credentials. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the download user. Was ZDI-CAN-11852. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31477
MISC
MISC google — android
  In Chromecast bootROM, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the bootloader, with physical USB access, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-174490700 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0467
MISC google — android
  Product: AndroidVersions: Android SoCAndroid ID: A-175402462 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0324
MISC google — chrome
  Use after free in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 91.0.4472.101 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-30546
MISC
MISC google — chrome
  Use after free in BFCache in Google Chrome prior to 91.0.4472.101 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-30544
MISC
MISC google — chrome
  Use after free in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 91.0.4472.101 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-30545
MISC
MISC google — chrome
  Use after free in Accessibility in Google Chrome prior to 91.0.4472.101 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-30550
MISC
MISC hasicorp — nomad_and_nomad_enterprise
  HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise up to version 1.0.4 bridge networking mode allows ARP spoofing from other bridged tasks on the same node. Fixed in 0.12.12, 1.0.5, and 1.1.0 RC1. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32575
MISC
MISC helm — helm
  Helm is a tool for managing Charts (packages of pre-configured Kubernetes resources). In versions of helm prior to 3.6.1, a vulnerability exists where the username and password credentials associated with a Helm repository could be passed on to another domain referenced by that Helm repository. This issue has been resolved in 3.6.1. There is a workaround through which one may check for improperly passed credentials. One may use a username and password for a Helm repository and may audit the Helm repository in order to check for another domain being used that could have received the credentials. In the `index.yaml` file for that repository, one may look for another domain in the `urls` list for the chart versions. If there is another domain found and that chart version was pulled or installed, the credentials would be passed on. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32690
MISC
CONFIRM hitachi — abb_power_grids_ellipse Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the main dashboard of Ellipse APM versions allows an authenticated user or integrated application to inject malicious data into the application that can then be executed in a victim’s browser. This issue affects: Hitachi ABB Power Grids Ellipse APM 5.3 version 5.3.0.1 and prior versions; 5.2 version 5.2.0.3 and prior versions; 5.1 version 5.1.0.6 and prior versions. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27887
CONFIRM hitachi — abb_power_grids_esoms
  Information Exposure vulnerability in Hitachi ABB Power Grids eSOMS allows unauthorized user to gain access to report data if the URL used to access the report is discovered. This issue affects: Hitachi ABB Power Grids eSOMS 6.0 versions prior to 6.0.4.2.2; 6.1 versions prior to 6.1.4; 6.3 versions prior to 6.3. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-26845
CONFIRM hitachi — multiple_products
  Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Hitachi ABB Power Grids Relion 670 Series, Relion 670/650 Series, Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO, Relion 650, REB500, RTU500 Series, FOX615 (TEGO1), MSM, GMS600, PWC600 allows an attacker with access to the IEC 61850 network with knowledge of how to reproduce the attack, as well as the IP addresses of the different IEC 61850 access points (of IEDs/products), to force the device to reboot, which renders the device inoperable for approximately 60 seconds. This vulnerability affects only products with IEC 61850 interfaces. This issue affects: Hitachi ABB Power Grids Relion 670 Series 1.1; 1.2.3 versions prior to 1.2.3.20; 2.0 versions prior to 2.0.0.13; 2.1; 2.2.2 versions prior to 2.2.2.3; 2.2.3 versions prior to 2.2.3.2. Hitachi ABB Power Grids Relion 670/650 Series 2.2.0 versions prior to 2.2.0.13. Hitachi ABB Power Grids Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO 2.2.1 versions prior to 2.2.1.6. Hitachi ABB Power Grids Relion 650 1.1; 1.2; 1.3 versions prior to 1.3.0.7. Hitachi ABB Power Grids REB500 7.3; 7.4; 7.5; 7.6; 8.2; 8.3. Hitachi ABB Power Grids RTU500 Series 7.x version 7.x and prior versions; 8.x version 8.x and prior versions; 9.x version 9.x and prior versions; 10.x version 10.x and prior versions; 11.x version 11.x and prior versions; 12.x version 12.x and prior versions. Hitachi ABB Power Grids FOX615 (TEGO1) R1D02 version R1D02 and prior versions. Hitachi ABB Power Grids MSM 2.1.0 versions prior to 2.1.0. Hitachi ABB Power Grids GMS600 1.3.0 version 1.3.0 and prior versions. Hitachi ABB Power Grids PWC600 1.0 versions prior to 1.0.1.4; 1.1 versions prior to 1.1.0.1. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27196
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM ibm — aix IBM AIX 7.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in the trace facility to expose sensitive information or cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 200663. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-29706
XF
CONFIRM ibm — financial_transaction_manager
  IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0.2 and 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 192952. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-5000
XF
CONFIRM ibm — resilient_soar
  IBM Resilient SOAR V38.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 199238. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20566
CONFIRM
XF ibm — resilient_soar
  IBM Resilient SOAR V38.0 could allow a local privileged attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper or nonexisting encryption.IBM X-Force ID: 199239. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20567
CONFIRM
XF ibm — security_identity_manager IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 could allow an authenticated malicious user to change the passwords of other users in the Windows AD environment when IBM Security Identity Manager Windows Password Synch Plug-in is deployed and configured. IBM X-Force ID: 197789. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20488
XF
CONFIRM ibm — security_identity_manager
  IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). By sending a specially crafted request, a remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive data. IBM X-Force ID: 197591. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20483
XF
CONFIRM insyde — insydeh2o An issue was discovered in IdeBusDxe in Insyde InsydeH2O 5.x. Code in system management mode calls a function outside of SMRAM in response to a crafted software SMI, aka Inclusion of Functionality from an Untrusted Control Sphere. Modifying the well-known address of this function allows an attacker to gain control of the system with the privileges of system management mode. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-27339
MISC
MISC intel — brand_verification_tool
  Improper permissions in the installer for the Intel(R) Brand Verification Tool before version 11.0.0.1225 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-0143
MISC jact — openclinic
  Jact OpenClinic 0.8.20160412 allows the attacker to read server files after login to the the admin account by an infected ‘file’ GET parameter in ‘/shared/view_source.php’ which “could” lead to RCE vulnerability . 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-20444
CONFIRM jdom — saxbuilder
  An XXE issue in SAXBuilder in JDOM through 2.0.6 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HTTP request. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33813
MISC
MISC
MISC jenkins — generic_webhook_trigger_plugin
  Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin 1.72 and earlier does not configure its XML parser to prevent XML external entity (XXE) attacks. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21669
CONFIRM
MLIST jenkins — scriptler Jenkins Scriptler Plugin 3.2 and earlier does not escape parameter names shown in job configuration forms, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Scriptler/Configure permission. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21667
CONFIRM
MLIST jenkins — scriptler
  Jenkins Scriptler Plugin 3.1 and earlier does not escape script content, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Scriptler/Configure permission. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21668
CONFIRM
MLIST jpress — jpress
  An issue was discovered in JPress v3.3.0 and below. There are XSS vulnerabilities in the template module and tag management module. If you log in to the background by means of weak password, the storage XSS vulnerability can occur. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33347
MISC
MISC kuaifancms — kuaifancms
  KuaiFanCMS V5.x contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the html_url parameter of the chakanhtml.module.php file. 2021-06-11 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3256
MISC laiketui — laiketui LaikeTui 3.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to delete arbitrary files, as demonstrated by deleting install.lock in order to reinstall the product in an attacker-controlled manner. This deletion is possible via directory traversal in the uploadImg, oldpic, or imgurl parameter. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34129
MISC laiketui — laiketui
  LaikeTui 3.5.0 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary PHP code by using index.php?module=system&action=pay to upload a ZIP archive containing a .php file, as demonstrated by the ../../../../phpinfo.php pathname. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34128
MISC linux — linux_kernel
  net/can/bcm.c in the Linux kernel through 5.12.10 allows local users to obtain sensitive information from kernel stack memory because parts of a data structure are uninitialized. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34693
MISC
MLIST linux — linux_kernel
  An Out-of-Bounds Read was discovered in arch/arm/mach-footbridge/personal-pci.c in the Linux kernel through 5.12.11 because of the lack of a check for a value that shouldn’t be negative, e.g., access to element -2 of an array, aka CID-298a58e165e4. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32078
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
MISC lutils — lutils
  All versions of package lutils are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via the main (merge) function. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23396
MISC magento — magento
  magento-scripts contains scripts and configuration used by Create Magento App, a zero-configuration tool-chain which allows one to deploy Magento 2. In versions 1.5.1 and 1.5.2, after changing the function from synchronous to asynchronous there wasn’t implemented handler in the start, stop, exec, and logs commands, effectively making them unusable. Version 1.5.3 contains patches for the problems. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32684
MISC
CONFIRM mantisbt — mantisbt
  An XSS issue was discovered in manage_custom_field_edit_page.php in MantisBT before 2.25.2. Unescaped output of the return parameter allows an attacker to inject code into a hidden input field. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33557
MISC
CONFIRM matrix — appservice-bridge
  Matrix-appservice-bridge is the bridging service for the Matrix communication program’s application services. In versions 2.6.0 and earlier, if a bridge has room upgrade handling turned on in the configuration (the `roomUpgradeOpts` key when instantiating a new `Bridge` instance.), any `m.room.tombstone` event it encounters will be used to unbridge the current room and bridge into the target room. However, the target room `m.room.create` event is not checked to verify if the `predecessor` field contains the previous room. This means that any malicious admin of a bridged room can repoint the traffic to a different room without the new room being aware. Versions 2.6.1 and greater are patched. As a workaround, disabling the automatic room upgrade handling can be done by removing the `roomUpgradeOpts` key from the `Bridge` class options. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32659
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM matrix — libolm
  Matrix libolm before 3.2.3 allows a malicious Matrix homeserver to crash a client (while it is attempting to retrieve an Olm encrypted room key backup from the homeserver) because olm_pk_decrypt has a stack-based buffer overflow. Remote code execution might be possible for some nonstandard build configurations. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34813
MISC
MISC
MISC mcusystem — mcusystem
  The login page in the MCUsystem does not filter with special characters, which allows remote attackers can inject JavaScript without privilege and thus perform reflected XSS attacks. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32536
MISC monstra — monstra
  A local file inclusion vulnerability was discovered in the captcha function in Monstra 3.0.4 which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2020-25414
MISC moodle — moodle
  Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Moodle 3.10.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary web script or HTML via the “Description” field. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32244
MISC moxa — mgate_mb3180
  An issue was discovered on MOXA Mgate MB3180 Version 2.1 Build 18113012. Attacker could send a huge amount of TCP SYN packet to make web service’s resource exhausted. Then the web server is denial-of-service. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33823
MISC
MISC moxa — mgate_mb3180
  An issue was discovered on MOXA Mgate MB3180 Version 2.1 Build 18113012. Attackers can use slowhttptest tool to send incomplete HTTP request, which could make server keep waiting for the packet to finish the connection, until its resource exhausted. Then the web server is denial-of-service. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33824
MISC
MISC
MISC nedb — nedb
  This affects all versions of package nedb. The library could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a __proto__ or constructor.prototype payload. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23395
MISC nextcloud — android_app
  Nextcloud Android app is the Android client for Nextcloud. In versions prior to 3.15.1, a malicious application on the same device is possible to crash the Nextcloud Android Client due to an uncaught exception. The vulnerability is patched in version 3.15.1. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32694
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC nextcloud — android_app
  Nextcloud Android app is the Android client for Nextcloud. In versions prior to 3.16.1, a malicious app on the same device could have gotten access to the shared preferences of the Nextcloud Android application. This required user-interaction as a victim had to initiate the sharing flow and choose the malicious app. The shared preferences contain some limited private data such as push tokens and the account name. The vulnerability is patched in version 3.16.1. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32695
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM nextcloud — talk
  Nextcloud Talk is a fully on-premises audio/video and chat communication service. Password protected shared chats in Talk before version 9.0.10, 10.0.8 and 11.2.2 did not rotate the session cookie after a successful authentication event. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Talk App is upgraded to 9.0.10, 10.0.8 or 11.2.2. No workarounds for this vulnerability are known to exist. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32676
CONFIRM
MISC octopus — server
  Affected versions of Octopus Server are prone to an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the Events REST API because user supplied data in the API request isn’t parameterised correctly. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow unauthorised access to database tables. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31818
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk An out-of-bounds write issue exists in the DWG file-reading procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32948
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk An out-of-bounds read issue exists in the DWG file-recovering procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or read sensitive information from memory locations. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32940
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk An out-of-bounds read issue exists within the parsing of DXF files in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer and allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or read sensitive information from memory locations. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32950
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk
  A use-after-free issue exists in the DGN file-reading procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a memory corruption or arbitrary code execution, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32944
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk
  Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read due to parsing of DWG files resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a read past the end of an allocated buffer and allows attackers to cause a denial-of service condition or read sensitive information from memory. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32938
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk
  An improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions issue exists within the parsing DGN files from Drawings SDK (Version 2022.4 and prior) resulting from the lack of proper validation of the user-supplied data. This may result in several of out-of-bounds problems and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32946
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk
  An out-of-bounds write issue exists in the DGN file-reading procedure in the Drawings SDK (Version 2022.4 and prior) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32952
MISC open_design_alliance — drawings_sdk
  An out-of-bounds write issue exists in the DXF file-recovering procedure in the Drawings SDK (All versions prior to 2022.4) resulting from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data. This can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer and allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service condition or execute code in the context of the current process. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32936
MISC opencast — opencast
  Opencast is a free and open source solution for automated video capture and distribution. Versions of Opencast prior to 9.6 are vulnerable to the billion laughs attack, which allows an attacker to easily execute a (seemingly permanent) denial of service attack, essentially taking down Opencast using a single HTTP request. To exploit this, users need to have ingest privileges, limiting the group of potential attackers The problem has been fixed in Opencast 9.6. There is no known workaround for this issue. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32623
MISC
CONFIRM opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12719. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31491
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop Build 16.6.4.55. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13673. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31502
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWG files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13310. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31501
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of DWG files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13311. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31497
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DXF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13308. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31496
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DXF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a memory corruption condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13307. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31495
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DXF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a memory corruption condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13304. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31493
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12720. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31492
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DXF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13305. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31494
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of SLDPRT files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied value prior to dereferencing it as a pointer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12659. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31481
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12715. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31487
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12711. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31485
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12710. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31484
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12709. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31483
N/A opentext — brava! This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12708. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31482
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied value prior to dereferencing it as a pointer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12746. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31500
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12633. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31478
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper initialization of a pointer prior to accessing it. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12634. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31479
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DXF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12654. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31480
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12716. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31488
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12745. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31499
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12744. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31498
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12717. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31489
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12712. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31486
N/A opentext — brava!
  This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12718. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31490
N/A otrs — ag_community_edition
  DoS attack can be performed when an email contains specially designed URL in the body. It can lead to the high CPU usage and cause low quality of service, or in extreme case bring the system to a halt. This issue affects: OTRS AG ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.0.x version 6.0.1 and later versions. OTRS AG OTRS 7.0.x version 7.0.26 and prior versions; 8.0.x version 8.0.13 and prior versions. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21439
MISC otrs — ag_community_edition
  There is a XSS vulnerability in the ticket overview screens. It’s possible to collect various information by having an e-mail shown in the overview screen. Attack can be performed by sending specially crafted e-mail to the system and it doesn’t require any user intraction. This issue affects: OTRS AG ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.0.x version 6.0.1 and later versions. OTRS AG OTRS 7.0.x version 7.0.26 and prior versions. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21441
MISC pagekit — pagekit
  In PageKit v1.0.18, a user can upload SVG files in the file upload portion of the CMS. These SVG files can contain malicious scripts. This file will be uploaded to the system and it will not be stripped or filtered. The user can create a link on the website pointing to “/storage/exp.svg” that will point to http://localhost/pagekit/storage/exp.svg. When a user comes along to click that link, it will trigger a XSS attack. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32245
MISC peloton — ttr01
  Insufficient verification of data authenticity in Peloton TTR01 up to and including PTV55G allows an attacker with physical access to boot into a modified kernel/ramdisk without unlocking the bootloader. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33887
MISC
MISC
MISC phpcms — phpcms phpCMS 2008 sp4 allowas remote malicious users to execute arbitrary php commands via the pagesize parameter to yp/product.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22201
MISC phpcms — phpcms
  SQL Injection in phpCMS 2008 sp4 via the genre parameter to yp/job.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22203
MISC phpcms — phpcms
  SQL Injection vulnerability in phpCMS 2007 SP6 build 0805 via the digg_mod parameter to digg_add.php. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-22199
MISC phpmailer — phpmailer
  PHPMailer before 6.5.0 on Windows allows remote code execution if lang_path is untrusted data and has a UNC pathname. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34551
CONFIRM phpmailer — phpmailer
  PHPMailer 6.4.1 and earlier contain a vulnerability that can result in untrusted code being called (if such code is injected into the host project’s scope by other means). If the $patternselect parameter to validateAddress() is set to ‘php’ (the default, defined by PHPMailer::$validator), and the global namespace contains a function called php, it will be called in preference to the built-in validator of the same name. Mitigated in PHPMailer 6.5.0 by denying the use of simple strings as validator function names. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3603
MISC
CONFIRM qemu — qemu An invalid pointer initialization issue was found in the SLiRP networking implementation of QEMU. The flaw exists in the udp6_input() function and could occur while processing a udp packet that is smaller than the size of the ‘udphdr’ structure. This issue may lead to out-of-bounds read access or indirect host memory disclosure to the guest. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects libslirp versions prior to 4.6.0. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3593
MISC qemu — qemu An invalid pointer initialization issue was found in the SLiRP networking implementation of QEMU. The flaw exists in the bootp_input() function and could occur while processing a udp packet that is smaller than the size of the ‘bootp_t’ structure. A malicious guest could use this flaw to leak 10 bytes of uninitialized heap memory from the host. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects libslirp versions prior to 4.6.0. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3592
MISC qemu — qemu
  An invalid pointer initialization issue was found in the SLiRP networking implementation of QEMU. The flaw exists in the udp_input() function and could occur while processing a udp packet that is smaller than the size of the ‘udphdr’ structure. This issue may lead to out-of-bounds read access or indirect host memory disclosure to the guest. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects libslirp versions prior to 4.6.0. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3594
MISC qemu — qemu
  An invalid pointer initialization issue was found in the SLiRP networking implementation of QEMU. The flaw exists in the tftp_input() function and could occur while processing a udp packet that is smaller than the size of the ‘tftp_t’ structure. This issue may lead to out-of-bounds read access or indirect host memory disclosure to the guest. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects libslirp versions prior to 4.6.0. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3595
MISC qnap — nas
  Insecure storage of sensitive information has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running myQNAPcloud Link. If exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to read sensitive information by accessing the unrestricted storage mechanism. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. myQNAPcloud Link versions prior to 2.2.21 on QTS 4.5.3; versions prior to 2.2.21 on QuTS hero h4.5.2; versions prior to 2.2.21 on QuTScloud c4.5.4. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-28815
CONFIRM quassel — quassel
  Quassel through 0.13.1, when –require-ssl is enabled, launches without SSL or TLS support if a usable X.509 certificate is not found on the local system. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34825
MISC rapid7 — nexpose
  Rapid7 Nexpose is vulnerable to a non-persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability affecting the Security Console’s Filtered Asset Search feature. A specific search criterion and operator combination in Filtered Asset Search could have allowed a user to pass code through the provided search field. This issue affects version 6.6.80 and prior, and is fixed in 6.6.81. If your Security Console currently falls on or within this affected version range, ensure that you update your Security Console to the latest version. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3535
CONFIRM receita — federal_irpf
  Receita Federal IRPF 2021 1.7 allows a man-in-the-middle attack against the update feature. 2021-06-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34682
MISC restund — restund
  Restund is an open source NAT traversal server. The restund TURN server can be instructed to open a relay to the loopback address range. This allows you to reach any other service running on localhost which you might consider private. In the configuration that we ship (https://github.com/wireapp/ansible-restund/blob/master/templates/restund.conf.j2#L40-L43) the `status` interface of restund is enabled and is listening on `127.0.0.1`.The `status` interface allows users to issue administrative commands to `restund` like listing open relays or draining connections. It would be possible for an attacker to contact the status interface and issue administrative commands by setting `XOR-PEER-ADDRESS` to `127.0.0.1:{{restund_udp_status_port}}` when opening a TURN channel. We now explicitly disallow relaying to loopback addresses, ‘any’ addresses, link local addresses, and the broadcast address. As a workaround disable the `status` module in your restund configuration. However there might still be other services running on `127.0.0.0/8` that you do not want to have exposed. The `turn` module can be disabled. Restund will still perform STUN and this might already be enough for initiating calls in your environments. TURN is only used as a last resort when other NAT traversal options do not work. One should also make sure that the TURN server is set up with firewall rules so that it cannot relay to other addresses that you don’t want the TURN server to relay to. For example other services in the same VPC where the TURN server is running. Ideally TURN servers should be deployed in an isolated fashion where they can only reach what they need to reach to perform their task of assisting NAT-traversal. 2021-06-11 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21382
MISC
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC
MISC riot — riot-os RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit bc59d60be60dfc0a05def57d74985371e4f22d79 contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31663
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM riot — riot-os
  RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 07f1254d8537497552e7dce80364aaead9266bbe contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31662
CONFIRM
MISC riot — riot-os
  RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 609c9ada34da5546cffb632a98b7ba157c112658 contains a buffer overflow that could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31661
MISC
CONFIRM riot — riot-os
  RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 85da504d2dc30188b89f44c3276fc5a25b31251f contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31660
MISC
CONFIRM riot — riot-os
  RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 44741ff99f7a71df45420635b238b9c22093647a contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31664
MISC
CONFIRM roanwiz — dext5editor
  Parameter manipulation can bypass authentication to cause file upload and execution. This will execute the remote code. This issue affects: Raonwiz DEXT5Editor versions prior to 3.5.1405747.1100.03. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-7864
MISC safenet — keysource_management_console
  SafeNet KeySecure Management Console 8.12.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-28979
MISC
MISC
MISC sap — netweaver_abap_server
  SAP NetWeaver ABAP Server and ABAP Platform, versions – 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 804, does not create information about internal and external RFC user in consistent and distinguished format, which could lead to improper authentication and may be exploited by malicious users to obtain illegitimate access to the system. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27610
MISC
MISC secure_8 — secure_8
  Secure 8 (Evalos) does not validate user input data correctly, allowing a remote attacker to perform a Blind SQL Injection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability in order to extract information of users and administrator accounts stored in the database. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-3604
CONFIRM
CONFIRM sentinel — ldk_run-time_environment
  The Sentinel LDK Run-Time Environment installer (Versions 7.6 and prior) adds a firewall rule named “Sentinel License Manager” that allows incoming connections from private networks using TCP Port 1947. While uninstalling, the uninstaller fails to close Port 1947. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32928
MISC serenityos — serenityos
  SerenityOS before commit 3844e8569689dd476064a0759d704bc64fb3ca2c contains a directory traversal vulnerability in tar/unzip that may lead to command execution or privilege escalation. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31272
MISC
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM serenityos — test-crypto.cpp
  SerenityOS in test-crypto.cpp contains a stack buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33186
CONFIRM serenityos — testbitmap
  SerenityOS contains a buffer overflow in the set_range test in TestBitmap which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33185
CONFIRM sinamics — sm@rtserver
  SINAMICS medium voltage routable products are affected by a vulnerability in the Sm@rtServer component for remote access that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition, and/or execution of limited configuration modifications and/or execution of limited control commands on the SINAMICS Medium Voltage Products, Remote Access (SINAMICS SL150: All versions, SINAMICS SM150: All versions, SINAMICS SM150i: All versions). 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27388
MISC sing4g — 4gee_router_hh70vb_version_hh70_e1_02.00_22
  An issue was discovered on 4GEE ROUTER HH70VB Version HH70_E1_02.00_22. Attackers can use slowhttptest tool to send incomplete HTTP request, which could make server keep waiting for the packet to finish the connection, until its resource exhausted. Then the web server is denial-of-service. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33822
MISC
MISC
MISC slim — nfc_70_10.01_devices
  Protectimus SLIM NFC 70 10.01 devices allow a Time Traveler attack in which attackers can predict TOTP passwords in certain situations. The time value used by the device can be set independently from the used seed value for generating time-based one-time passwords, without authentication. Thus, an attacker with short-time physical access to a device can set the internal real-time clock (RTC) to the future, generate one-time passwords, and reset the clock to the current time. This allows the generation of valid future time-based one-time passwords without having further access to the hardware token. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32033
MISC
FULLDISC sonatype — nexus_repository_manager
  Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 3.x before 3.31.0 allows a remote authenticated attacker to get a list of blob files and read the content of a blob file (via a GET request) without having been granted access. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34553
CONFIRM sonicos — sonicos
  A buffer overflow vulnerability in SonicOS allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted request. This vulnerability affects SonicOS Gen5, Gen6, Gen7 platforms, and SonicOSv virtual firewalls. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20027
CONFIRM sourcecodester — alumni_management_system
  SQL injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Alumni Management System 1.0 allows the user to inject SQL payload to bypass the authentication via admin/login.php. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29214
EXPLOIT-DB sourcecodester — alumni_management_system
  A Cross Site Scripting in SourceCodester Employee Management System 1.0 allows the user to execute alert messages via /Employee Management System/addemp.php on admin account. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-29215
EXPLOIT-DB stampit — supermixer
  Prototype pollution in Stampit supermixer 1.0.3 allows an attacker to modify the prototype of a base object which can vary in severity depending on the implementation. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2020-24939
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
MISC striptags — striptags
  The npm package “striptags” is an implementation of PHP’s strip_tags in Typescript. In striptags before version 3.2.0, a type-confusion vulnerability can cause `striptags` to concatenate unsanitized strings when an array-like object is passed in as the `html` parameter. This can be abused by an attacker who can control the shape of their input, e.g. if query parameters are passed directly into the function. This can lead to a XSS. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32696
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM
MISC studio-42 — elfinder
  The package studio-42/elfinder before 2.1.58 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via execution of PHP code in a .phar file. NOTE: This only applies if the server parses .phar files as PHP. 2021-06-13 not yet calculated CVE-2021-23394
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM
CONFIRM sylabs — singularity
  Sylabs Singularity 3.5.x and 3.6.x, and SingularityPRO before 3.5-8, has an Incorrect Check of a Function’s Return Value. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33622
MISC
MISC symfony — symfony
  Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. A vulnerability related to firewall authentication is in Symfony starting with version 5.3.0 and prior to 5.3.2. When an application defines multiple firewalls, the token authenticated by one of the firewalls was available for all other firewalls. This could be abused when the application defines different providers for each part of the application, in such a situation, a user authenticated on a part of the application could be considered authenticated on the rest of the application. Starting in version 5.3.2, a patch ensures that the authenticated token is only available for the firewall that generates it. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32693
MISC
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC synology — calendar
  Use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability in php component in Synology Calendar before 2.4.0-0761 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34812
CONFIRM synology — download_station Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34811
CONFIRM synology — download_station
  Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command (‘Command Injection’) vulnerability in task management component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34809
CONFIRM synology — download_station
  Improper privilege management vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Download Station before 3.8.16-3566 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34810
CONFIRM synology — media_server
  Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in cgi component in Synology Media Server before 1.8.3-2881 allows remote attackers to access intranet resources via unspecified vectors. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34808
CONFIRM teamviewer — teamviewer
  TeamViewer before 14.7.48644 on Windows loads untrusted DLLs in certain situations. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34803
MISC tenvoy — tenvoy
  tEnvoy contains the PGP, NaCl, and PBKDF2 in node.js and the browser (hashing, random, encryption, decryption, signatures, conversions), used by TogaTech.org. In versions prior to 7.0.3, the `verifyWithMessage` method of `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` always returns `true` for any signature that has a SHA-512 hash matching the SHA-512 hash of the message even if the signature was invalid. This issue is patched in version 7.0.3. As a workaround: In `tenvoy.js` under the `verifyWithMessage` method definition within the `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` class, ensure that the return statement call to `this.verify` ends in `.verified`. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32685
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM thycotic — password_reset_server
  Thycotic Password Reset Server before 5.3.0 allows credential disclosure. 2021-06-11 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34679
MISC tp-link — tl-wpa4220 TP-Link’s TL-WPA4220 4.0.2 Build 20180308 Rel.37064 does not use SSL by default. Attacker on the local network can monitor traffic and capture the cookie and other sensitive information. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-28858
MISC tp-link — tl-wpa4220
  TP-Link’s TL-WPA4220 4.0.2 Build 20180308 Rel.37064 username and password are sent via the cookie. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-28857
MISC trend_micro — interscan_web_security_virtual_appliance
  Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance version 6.5 was found to have a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the product’s Captive Portal. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31521
MISC trendnet — tw100-s4w1ca
  In TrendNet TW100-S4W1CA 2.3.32, due to a lack of proper session controls, a threat actor could make unauthorized changes to an affected router via a specially crafted web page. If an authenticated user were to interact with a malicious web page it could allow for a complete takeover of the router. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32424
MISC trendnet — tw100-s4w1ca
  In TrendNet TW100-S4W1CA 2.3.32, it is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the router’s web interface via the “echo” command. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32426
MISC ubuntu — ubuntu It was discovered that the get_modified_conffiles() function in backends/packaging-apt-dpkg.py allowed injecting modified package names in a manner that would confuse the dpkg(1) call. 2021-06-12 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32556
MISC unegg — unegg
  UnEGG v0.5 and eariler versions have a Integer overflow vulnerability, triggered when the user opens a malformed specific file that is mishandled by UnEGG. Attackers could exploit this and arbitrary code execution. This issue affects: Estsoft UnEGG 0.5 versions prior to 1.0 on linux. 2021-06-11 not yet calculated CVE-2020-7860
MISC unifi_protect — g3_flex_camera_version
  An issue was discovered in UniFi Protect G3 FLEX Camera Version UVC.v4.30.0.67. Attackers can use slowhttptest tool to send incomplete HTTP request, which could make server keep waiting for the packet to finish the connection, until its resource exhausted. Then the web server is denial-of-service. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33818
MISC
MISC
MISC unifi_protect — g3_flex_camera_version
  An issue was discovered in UniFi Protect G3 FLEX Camera Version UVC.v4.30.0.67.Attacker could send a huge amount of TCP SYN packet to make web service’s resource exhausted. Then the web server is denial-of-service. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-33820
MISC
MISC
MISC valine — valine
  Valine 1.4.14 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) by supplying a ua (aka User-Agent) value that only specifies the product and version. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-34801
MISC veryfitpro — veryfitpro
  The VeryFitPro (com.veryfit2hr.second) application 3.2.8 for Android does all communication with the backend API over cleartext HTTP. This includes logins, registrations, and password change requests. This allows information theft and account takeover via network sniffing. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32612
MISC
MISC
MISC
FULLDISC vmware — tools
  VMware Tools for Windows (11.x.y prior to 11.3.0) contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in the VM3DMP driver. A malicious actor with local user privileges in the Windows guest operating system, where VMware Tools is installed, can trigger a PANIC in the VM3DMP driver leading to a denial-of-service condition in the Windows guest operating system. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-21997
MISC wagtail — wagtail
  Wagtail is an open source content management system built on Django. A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in versions 2.13-2.13.1, versions 2.12-2.12.4, and versions prior to 2.11.8. When the `{% include_block %}` template tag is used to output the value of a plain-text StreamField block (`CharBlock`, `TextBlock` or a similar user-defined block derived from `FieldBlock`), and that block does not specify a template for rendering, the tag output is not properly escaped as HTML. This could allow users to insert arbitrary HTML or scripting. This vulnerability is only exploitable by users with the ability to author StreamField content (i.e. users with ‘editor’ access to the Wagtail admin). Patched versions have been released as Wagtail 2.11.8 (for the LTS 2.11 branch), Wagtail 2.12.5, and Wagtail 2.13.2 (for the current 2.13 branch). As a workaround, site implementors who are unable to upgrade to a current supported version should audit their use of `{% include_block %}` to ensure it is not used to output `CharBlock` / `TextBlock` values with no associated template. Note that this only applies where `{% include_block %}` is used directly on that block (uses of `include_block` on a block _containing_ a CharBlock / TextBlock, such as a StructBlock, are unaffected). In these cases, the tag can be replaced with Django’s `{{ … }}` syntax – e.g. `{% include_block my_title_block %}` becomes `{{ my_title_block }}`. 2021-06-17 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32681
MISC
MISC
CONFIRM
MISC wbu-systems — codemeter
  A buffer over-read vulnerability exists in Wibu-Systems CodeMeter versions < 7.21a. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this issue to disclose heap memory contents or crash the CodeMeter Runtime Server. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20093
MISC
MISC wbu-systems — codemeter
  A denial of service vulnerability exists in Wibu-Systems CodeMeter versions < 7.21a. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this issue to crash the CodeMeter Runtime Server. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-20094
MISC
MISC wire — wire
  wire-webapp is the web version of Wire, an open-source messenger. A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in wire-webapp prior to version 2021-06-01-production.0. If a user is instructed to open an image in a new tab (right click -> open in new tab, or copy the URL and paste it in the URL bar), an the image payload is executed on the domain hosting the app (app.wire.com). In particular, if an image contains malicious code in addition to the actual picture, this code is executed on app.wire.com. This allows the attacker to fully control the user account. The vulnerability was patched in version 2021-06-01-production.0. As a workaround, users should not try to open image URLs. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2021-32683
MISC
CONFIRM wordpress — wordpress This Gallery from files WordPress plugin through 1.6.0 gives the functionality of uploading images to the server. But filenames are not properly sanitized before being output in an error message when they have an invalid extension, leading to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting issue. Due to the lack of CSRF check, the attack could also be performed via such vector. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24349
CONFIRM wordpress — wordpress The SP Project & Document Manager WordPress plugin before 4.22 allows users to upload files, however, the plugin attempts to prevent php and other similar files that could be executed on the server from being uploaded by checking the file extension. It was discovered that php files could still be uploaded by changing the file extension’s case, for example, from “php” to “pHP”. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24347
CONFIRM wordpress — wordpress The Stock in & out WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 has a search functionality, the lowest accessible level to it being contributor. The srch POST parameter is not validated, sanitised or escaped before using it in the echo statement, leading to a reflected XSS issue 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24346
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress In the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4, the lack of capability checks and insufficient nonce check on the AJAX actions, simple301redirects/admin/get_wildcard and simple301redirects/admin/wildcard, made it possible for authenticated users to retrieve and update the wildcard value for redirects. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24355
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  The import_data function of the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 had no capability or nonce checks making it possible for unauthenticated users to import a set of site redirects. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24353
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  In the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4, a lack of capability checks and insufficient nonce check on the AJAX action, simple301redirects/admin/activate_plugin, made it possible for authenticated users to activate arbitrary plugins installed on vulnerable sites. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24356
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  The export_data function of the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 had no capability or nonce checks making it possible for unauthenticated users to export a site’s redirects. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24352
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  The Smart Slider 3 Free and pro WordPress plugins before 3.5.0.9 did not sanitise the Project Name before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. By default, only administrator users could access the affected functionality, limiting the exploitability of the vulnerability. However, some WordPress admins may allow lesser privileged users to access the plugin’s functionality, in which case, privilege escalation could be performed. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24382
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  When deleting a date in the Xllentech English Islamic Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.8, the year_number and month_number POST parameters are not sanitised, escaped or validated before being used in a SQL statement, leading to SQL injection. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24341
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  The menu delete functionality of the Side Menu – add fixed side buttons WordPress plugin before 3.1.5, available to Administrator users takes the did GET parameter and uses it into an SQL statement without proper sanitisation, validation or escaping, therefore leading to a SQL Injection issue 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24348
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  The theplus_more_post AJAX action of The Plus Addons for Elementor Page Builder WordPress plugin before 4.1.12 did not properly sanitise some of its fields, leading to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (exploitable on both unauthenticated and authenticated users) 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24351
MISC
CONFIRM wordpress — wordpress
  A lack of capability checks and insufficient nonce check on the AJAX action in the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4, made it possible for authenticated users to install arbitrary plugins on vulnerable sites. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24354
CONFIRM
MISC wordpress — wordpress
  The page lists-management feature of the Sendit WP Newsletter WordPress plugin through 2.5.1, available to Administrator users does not sanitise, validate or escape the id_lista POST parameter before using it in SQL statement, therefore leading to Blind SQL Injection. 2021-06-14 not yet calculated CVE-2021-24345
CONFIRM
MISC wowonder — wowonder
  In WoWonder 3.0.4, remote attackers can take over any account due to the weak cryptographic algorithm in recover.php. The code parameter is easily predicted from the time of day. 2021-06-11 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27200
MISC
MISC
MISC zettlr — zettlr
  No filtering of cross-site scripting (XSS) payloads in the markdown-editor in Zettlr 1.8.7 allows attackers to perform remote code execution via a crafted file. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-26835
MISC
MISC znote — znote
  A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Znote 0.5.2. An attacker can insert payloads, and the code execution will happen immediately on markdown view mode. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2021-26834
MISC
MISC zoho — manageengine_password_manager_pro
  In Zoho ManageEngine Password Manager Pro before 11.1 build 11104, attackers are able to retrieve credentials via a browser extension for non-website resource types. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31857
MISC
CONFIRM zoho — manageengine_servicedesk_plus
  Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10519 is vulnerable to a User Enumeration bug due to improper error-message generation in the Forgot Password functionality, aka SDPMSP-15732. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-31159
CONFIRM
MISC
MISC zoll — defibrillator_dashboard ZOLL Defibrillator Dashboard, v prior to 2.2, The affected products contain credentials stored in plaintext. This could allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27487
MISC zoll — defibrillator_dashboard
  ZOLL Defibrillator Dashboard, v prior to 2.2,The affected product’s web application could allow a low privilege user to inject parameters to contain malicious scripts to be executed by higher privilege users. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27479
MISC zoll — defibrillator_dashboard
  ZOLL Defibrillator Dashboard, v prior to 2.2, The affected products utilize an encryption key in the data exchange process, which is hardcoded. This could allow an attacker to gain access to sensitive information. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27481
MISC zoll — defibrillator_dashboard
  ZOLL Defibrillator Dashboard, v prior to 2.2,The affected products contain insecure filesystem permissions that could allow a lower privilege user to escalate privileges to an administrative level user. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27483
MISC zoll — defibrillator_dashboard
  ZOLL Defibrillator Dashboard, v prior to 2.2,The application allows users to store their passwords in a recoverable format, which could allow an attacker to retrieve the credentials from the web browser. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27485
MISC zoll — defibrillator_dashboard
  ZOLL Defibrillator Dashboard, v prior to 2.2, The web application allows a non-administrative user to upload a malicious file. This file could allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary commands. 2021-06-16 not yet calculated CVE-2021-27489
MISC zrlog — zrlog
  A Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the comment section in ZrLog 2.1.3, which allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script and stolen administrator cookies via the nickname parameter and gain access to the admin panel. 2021-06-15 not yet calculated CVE-2020-21316
MISC
MISC
MISC zzipblib — zziplib
  Infinite Loop in zziplib v0.13.69 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via the return value “zzip_file_read” in the function “unzzip_cat_file”. 2021-06-18 not yet calculated CVE-2020-18442
MISC
Updates to Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning

Updates to Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

 


Azure Machine Learning (AML) team is excited to announce the availability of Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning (ML) public preview release. All customers of Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes now can deploy AzureML extension release and bring AML to , and the edge using Kubernetes on their hardware of choice.


 


The design for Azure Arc-enabled ML helps IT Operators leverage native Kubernetes concepts such as namespace, node selector, and resources requests/limits for ML compute utilization and optimization. By letting the IT operator manage ML compute setup, Azure Arc-enabled ML creates a seamless AML experience for data scientists who do not need to learn or use Kubernetes directly. Data scientists now can focus on models and work with tools such as Azure Machine Learning AML Studio, AML 2.0 CLI, AML Python SDK, productivity tools like Jupyter notebook, and ML frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch.


 


IT Operator experience – ML compute setup


Once Kubernetes cluster is up and running, IT Operator can follow 3 simple steps below to prepare cluster for AML workload:



  • Connect Kubernetes cluster to Azure via Azure Arc

  • Deploy AzureML extension to Azure Arc-enabled cluster

  • Create a compute target for Data Scientists to use


For the first two steps, IT Operator can simply run the following two CLI commands to accomplish:


bozhong68_0-1624269935596.png


 


Once AzureML extension installation completes in cluster, you will see following AzureML pods running inside the :


bozhong68_1-1624269935663.png


 


With your cluster ready to take AML workload, now you can head over to AML Studio portal and create compute target for Data Scientists to use, see below AML Studio compute attach UI:


bozhong68_2-1624269935671.png


 


Note by clicking “New->Kubernetes (preview)”, the Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes clusters will automatically appear in a dropdown list for IT Operator to attach. In the process of Studio UI attach operation, IT Operator could provide an optional JSON configuration file specifying namespace, node selector, and resources requests/limits to be used for the compute target being created. With these advanced configurations in compute target, IT Operator help Data Scientists target a subset of nodes such as GPU pool or CPU pool for training job, improves compute resource utilization and avoids fragmentation. For more information about creating compute targets using these custom properties, please refer to AML documentation.


 


For upcoming Azure Arc-enabled ML update release, we plan to support compute target creation through CLI command as well, and ML compute setup experience will be simplified to following 3 CLI commands:


bozhong68_3-1624269935673.png


 


Note when connecting Kubernetes cluster to Azure via Azure Arc, IT Operator can also specify configuration setting to enable outbound proxy server. We are pleased to announce that Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning fully supports model training on-premises with outbound proxy server connection.


 


Data Scientist experience – train models


Once the attached Kubernetes compute target is available, Data Scientist can discover the list of compute targets in AML Studio UI compute section. Data Scientist can choose a suitable compute target to submit training job, such as GPU compute target, or CPU compute target with proper resources requests for particular training job workload, such as the # of vCPU cores and memory. Data Scientist can submit job either through AML 2.0 CLI or AML Python SDK, in either case Data Scientist will specify compute target name at job submission time. Azure Arc-enabled ML supports the following built-in AML training features seamlessly:



For those Data Science professionals who have used AML Python SDK, existing AML Python SDK examples and notebooks, or your existing projects will work out-of-box with a simple change of compute target name in Python script. If you are not familiar with Python SDK yet, please refer to above links to get started.


 


AML team is extremely excited that Azure Arc-enabled ML supports the latest and greatest AML 2.0 CLI training job submission, which is in public preview also. Train models with AML 2.0 CLI is simple and easy with following CLI command:


bozhong68_4-1624269935673.png


 


Let’s take a look at job YAML file:


bozhong68_5-1624269935675.png


 


Note job YAML file specifies all training job needed resources and assets including training scripts and compute target. In this case, Data Scientist is using Azure Arc-enabled compute target created by IT Operator earlier. Running the job creation CLI command will submit job to Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes cluster and opens AML Studio UI portal for Data Scientist to monitor job running status, analyze metrics, and examine logs. Please refer to Train models with the 2.0 CLI for more information and examples.


bozhong68_6-1624269935685.png


 


Get started today


In this post, we provided status updates to Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning and showed how IT Operator can easily setup and prepare Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes cluster for AML workload, and how Data Scientist can easily train models with AML 2.0 CLI and Kubernetes compute target.


 


To get started with Azure Arc-enabled ML for training public preview, visit Azure Arc-enabled ML Training Public Preview Github repository, where you can find detailed documentation for IT Operator and Data Scientist, and examples for you to try out easily. In addition, visit the official AML documentation to find more information.


 


Azure Arc-enabled ML also supports model training with interactive job experience and debugging, which is in private preview. Please sign up here for interactive job private preview.


 


After Data Scientist trains a model, ML Engineer or Model Deployment Pro can deploy the model with Azure Arc-enabled ML on the same Arc-enabled Kubernetes cluster, which is in private preview too. Please sign up here for inference private preview.


Also, check out these additional great AML blog posts!



 


 


 


 


 


 

Part 2 – You Might Want to Audit Your LAPS Permissions….

by | Jun 21, 2021 | Technology

This article is contributed. See the original author and article here.

Part 2 – Deploy LAPS, Check!  You’re all set, right?  Maybe… 


 


Hi Team, Eric Jansen here to follow up on some auditing suggestions that I mentioned for those of you that have LAPS deployed in your environment, in part one of this series.  If you haven’t read part one, then part two likely won’t make much sense, so I encourage you to read that as a prerequisite.  Since publishing part one, I’ve had questions, concerns, and feedback from readers, customers, friends, and other Microsoft engineers.  In today’s blog, I’d like to address some of those to hopefully provide even more clarity on why auditing LAPS in your enterprise is so important. 


  


I’m going to start by addressing a comment that I got from a cyber security engineer: 


  


Security Engineer:  “Our users don’t have the Remote Server Administration Tools (RSAT) on their workstations, so I don’t see this as a big risk”. 


  


Me: “Uh oh.  If you think that, being a security guy, then you probably aren’t the only one.” 


Me: Proceeded to show examples of why having RSAT on the workstation doesn’t matter. 


  


Note to self: Write this down – good content to share… 


  


Ok, so why was this so alarming to me?  In short, it’s because you don’t need the RSAT tools to accomplish this.  You could use any number of tools to search a directory with the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), to include some that have no prerequisites and are built into the Windows OS.  I just need to be a regular user with a relatively modern Windows OS that has PowerShell on it, and I have the ability to harvest LAPS passwords if delegations aren’t kept in check on computer objects.   


  


Case in Point:  The PowerShell ADSI Searcher Type Accelerator…  The [ADSISearcher] Type Accelerator is a wrapper for the DirectorySearcher .Net Class, which comes from the System.DirectoryServices Namespace and is used to perform queries against the Active Directory Domain Services hierarchy using LDAP. 


  


Below is a basic snippet of code that I wrote to demonstrate my point.  By running this as a regular user in PowerShell, if the extended rights on the computer object aren’t set correctly, then the password harvesting fest will begin: 


 


 

$ADSISearcher = [ADSISearcher]'(&(objectclass=computer)(ms-mcs-admpwd=*))' 
$AllComputers = $ADSISearcher.FindAll() 
$DailyHarvest = @() 

Foreach($Comp in $AllComputers){ 
$DailyHarvest += New-Object psobject -Property @{Name = $Comp.properties.name; Password = $Comp.properties.'ms-mcs-admpwd';} 
} 

$DailyHarvest 

 


 


Next is a common question that I get asked by customers: 


  


Customer:  “After running through your LAPS auditing blog and seeing less than desirable results in the findings from our environment, we’d like this addressed immediately, but on an on-going basis.  What do we need to do to regularly audit this?” 


  


Me:  “Great question, maybe we just setup a group managed service account to run a scheduled task and if there are any findings, email a notification to a distribution list that includes the administrative support team with suggested investigative and fix actions.” 


    


Like I said in part one, sometimes you just need that attention getter, but once the customer sees the findings, in most cases, they’ll want to fix it.   


  


For those that do want to patch things up, you’d need to do scans of the environment like you would with anything else.  One way to accomplish this would be to use a Group Managed Service Account (gMSA) to run on a scheduled task to run something similar to the one liner that I pointed out in part one, but maybe ‘out’ the list of machines with bad ACLs to a file on a share: 


  

Get-ADComputer -Filter * -Properties MS-Mcs-AdmPwd | Where-Object MS-Mcs-AdmPwd -ne $null | Select -ExpandProperty Name | Out-File $Path

  


An item of note however is that a gMSA is derived from the Computer Class, which is derived from the User Class, which is why the gMSA has an attribute for primaryGroupID.  If you look at said primaryGroupID for a gMSA you’ll notice that the default primary group is GROUP_RID_COMPUTERS, better known a “Domain Computers”.  With that said, you’ll want to add the gMSA to the “Domain Users” group to get that same ‘apples-to-apples’ comparison so that it more closely mirrors the findings that I outlined in part one, where we would see pre-staged computer objects given excessive rights, again, the most common being “Domain Users”, “Authenticated Users”, ”BUILTINUsers”, and “Everyone”.  Is it a true ‘apples-to-apples’ comparison though?  Not exactly, because when the gMSA runs, it’s also a member of “Domain Computers”. 


  


In one customer environment where we set this up, the scheduled task ran, but shockingly it came back with 1200+ MORE passwords (this was a large enterprise consisting of about 100K machines) when running under the gMSA context.  The reason was because for those 1200+ machines, “Domain Computers” was given the “All Extended Rights” permission.  So in their case, that also needed to be cleaned up.


  


But why does that matter if a regular user won’t be running as a gMSA?  Great question! 


  


You’re correct, the regular user wouldn’t be running as a gMSA, but it’s relatively easy to run as a computer, which has the same group membership (to “Domain Computers”).  As an example, let’s say that your regular user account had an initial harvest, collecting passwords from 900 machines.  Maybe a third of those are turned off or stale and permanently offline, and let’s say that for one reason or another you just can’t connect to another third of those.  So, we’ll say that there’s roughly 300 machines that are online and you ARE able to connect to those machines.  Now it’s just a matter of that user jumping on one of those machines as an admin and then running the same one line of code that they ran as a regular user, but this time as System.   


  


For those that don’t know what that does, System has extensive privileges on the local computer, but more importantly for our mission of harvesting more LAPS passwords, it “acts as the computer on the network“.   


  


So, if I’m running as System on one of the machines that I essentially was “given” the password to, when accessing a resource over the network it would be seen as the ComputerName$, which by default, will belong to ‘Domain Computers’.  With that being the case and if “Domain Computers” was given the “All Extended Rights” permission, now I just got the keys to another 1200+ computer accounts…and the day just got worse. 


  


Oh, but there’s more… 


  


The last thing that I want to talk about is more of an interesting scenario that’s recently happened that’s very relevant, makes the LAPS password harvesting even more scary, and should hopefully convince those who don’t see this as a big deal that maybe they really should audit the LAPS permissions in their environment: 


  


Customer:  “In doing some coding to validate group members of “Protected Groups” I noticed that someone changed the password of the Administrator account for the domain, but everyone says that they didn’t do it.  I need some help figuring out what’s going on.“ 


  


Me: “Interesting, let’s dig in…” 


  


In this scenario, we ran the following command to figure out when and where this change occurred: 


  


Repadmin /ShowObjMeta <DomainController> <”DN Path of the Administrator Account”> 


  


When digging in, we found that the change was done at a DC at a remote site, at X time, on the prior day.  So, he jumps on that DC, opens the security log and scrolls down to that timeframe, down to the second.  In that second there were probably 40 or 50 events, BUT he found the event where the password change was logged!  Awesome, except that no user was tied to that change, it showed that the DC itself made the change.  I thought of a couple of scenarios of how that was possible, but then he mentioned that the version number for the pwdLastSet attribute was up to almost 400, which was quite high for this relatively small environment that isn’t even 10 years old yet.  In short, we tracked it down to the LAPS client-side extension on the DC that was changing the password.  We found that the LAPS GPO, which had the default account defined (-500 SID, representing the Administrator account), was applied at the Domain Level, which applied to Domain Controllers, which in fact changed the password for the Administrator account for the domain.  So, when the password timestamp expired for each individual domain controller, upon the next policy refresh, that specific domain controller would reset the Administrator password; That explained why the version number was so high. 


  


Just to verify the finding, he used Reset-AdmPwdPassword cmdlet from the AdmPwd.PS (LAPS) PowerShell module and set -WhenEffective to the current time, so that the password would be reset again upon the next policy refresh.  The policy was refreshed and an updated Repadmin /ShowObjMeta showed that the password was changed on the DC that had Reset-AdmPwdPassword run against its computer object.  Now the test…. Can he log in as Administrator to a DC, with the password that was written to the MS-MCS-AdmPwd attribute on that remote site’s DC?  Yep… 


  


So, if that’s the case, then the possibility exists that the domain’s Administrator account credentials could be harvested.  From there, it’s game over, and the next thing you know, your pipeline is shutdown… 


  


Also, in case it doesn’t go without saying, don’t install the LAPS client-side extension on the DC and have a policy try to manage it, or at least if you do, have a very good understanding of what you’re doing…but even then, I wouldn’t recommend it… 


 


Until next time!  


  


Disclaimer:


The content above contains a sample script.  Sample scripts are not supported under any Microsoft standard support program or service. The sample scripts are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. Microsoft further disclaims all implied warranties including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose. The entire risk arising out of the use or performance of the sample scripts and documentation remains with you. In no event shall Microsoft, its authors, or anyone else involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the scripts be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of or inability to use the sample scripts or documentation, even if Microsoft has been advised of the possibility of such damages.


 


Tags: LAPS, ms-Mcs-AdmPwd, ExtendedRightHolders, “All Extended Rights”, Security, Find-AdmPwdExtendedRights, Reset-AdmPwdPassword, Auditing, Pipeline